<p>Nah, marsupial one was long gestation period. You’re right about the other two assumptions, I think. Morphology is wrong because the crabs could look almost identical, embryo development would be REALLY similar. DNA would be the most accurate distinguisher of diff species, IMO</p>
<p>Ugh… I feel like killing myself.
The first 60 questions were totally centered on ecology, and they were shady, too. I didn’t expect to get 2/3 biome questions wrong in the beginning! On the other hand, the molecular and genetics part was retardedly easy. I smell CollegeBoard turning away from logic and embracing pure memorization… I skipped 4~5 and probably got 5 ish wrong. ■■■</p>
<p>Definitely substrate. The first three were ruled out, because they were the same distance from the tide line. The other might have been “den burrow density” or some crap, but that would have taken some wild inference to actually arrive at that conclusion. </p>
<p>One group of crabs were chillaxin in mud, and the other in sand. That’s the only one you can infer.</p>
<p>Yes, if the curve is the same as the test in the Official College Board SAT Subject Test study guides (the other big blue book). I have it in front of me right now, 73 and 72 out of 80 are both 770s.</p>
<p>Possibly. Depends on how the rest of the world does on stupid ecology questions that made up most of the 60 main question section. Honestly, who the hell studied for Marsupials =/ </p>
<p>I thought it wasn’t too hard or too easy, but others think differently. Possibly a more generous curve than that, IMO.</p>
<p>what was the answer for the one about acid rain?
i wasnt sure i put something about methane because the others didnt make sense at first. but now im doubting my answer… could it have been burning of fossil fuels, i just thought that contributed to the greenhouse effect so i completely ruled it out</p>