October 2010 CR SAT Thread

<p>Alleviate- AMERICAN cheetahs are extinct XD</p>

<p>You don’t see any cheetahs around here do you? lololololol</p>

<p>2 people question- answered before but it was that she was not unique with likely unpompous language.</p>

<p>reconciliation was right.</p>

<p>For the journalist sentence…Despite the journalists’ [retiring] social life, she maintained a [penchant for] sensationalism." Though that’s not the exact wording, the two words needed to contrast and diffident…aversion do not contrast.</p>

<p>that certain breed was extinct</p>

<p>last paragraph was about how style and substance related</p>

<p>@Linger yes i got that too</p>

<p>@alleviate i believe the author was referring to a specific kind of cheetah that was indigenous to america.</p>

<p>

Lolololol. I like how woojoo and I are explaining why the answer is archaeological and the people who answered Homer are just being all whiny and not explaining anything.</p>

<p>I was in extended time testing and I had a total of 9 sections including writing. Did people with regular time have 10 sections with one as an “experimental section?”</p>

<p>@impatient, the answer for that one was like style v. substance or something.</p>

<p>i put one tht was like the anecdote introduced her opinion of writing or somehting for the critic one</p>

<p>Not diffident - aversion, as those suggest the same thing. Unfortunately I believe I picked this.</p>

<p>You guys are missing my point. He did mention archeology, but Homer had the most influence on his argument.</p>

<p>It was referring to the AMERICAN cheetah and the mammoth.</p>

<p>@boston. But who ever proved that thy was right? XD</p>

<p>Although the journalist was <strong><em>, almost self-effacing in her personal affairs, she had _</em></strong> public controversy and something.</p>

<p>looks like I got this one wrong. its not diffident…aversion.</p>

<p>c’mon guys</p>

<p>homer having influence does not mean he was what thucydides used to try to derive proof</p>

<p>For the meaning of “hacked down” was it pruning injudiciously or criticizing vigorously?
i thought it was criticizing at first, but i felt it was too extreme of an answer…</p>

<p>what were the other choices for the cheetah extinction question?</p>

<p>

Ugh. Ad nauseum…</p>

<p>yeah that was the question theimpatientone. I believe it was retiring and penchant or w.e</p>

<p>prune just doesn’t work as a verb LOL</p>

<p>–verb (used with object), pruned, prun·ing.
1.
to cut or lop off (twigs, branches, or roots).
2.
to cut or lop superfluous or undesired twigs, branches, or roots from; trim.
3.
to rid or clear of (anything superfluous or undesirable).
4.
to remove (anything considered superfluous or undesirable).</p>

<p>they were her critics not her editors</p>

<p>@hellokitt i put critizing vigorously</p>