October 2010 CR SAT Thread

<p>Short Passages
harming the function of america’s democracy or something.
interfere with government’s democray</p>

<p>To harambee: this was experimental</p>

<p>

Too bad that’s not what was on the SAT…</p>

<p>I think impiousness was exp. I don’t remember that one either.</p>

<p>i didn’t put inimical for anything</p>

<p>@Haeji: I put ‘benign’ since the sentence was about some nuclear engineer that believed nuclear energy was _______ because it had no emissions. Inimical means dangerous?</p>

<p>@archaeology people</p>

<p>It didn’t ask which form of evidence was most concrete.</p>

<p>Did you guys get "he conceded a point in order to rebuttle it in the next sentence?</p>

<p>not inimical, benign (they are opposites) and the question was looking for a synonym to “harmless” so it was benign</p>

<p>@boston, actually that was exactly what it was on the SAT</p>

<p>@ brokbrok yes that is right.</p>

<p>Um @boston </p>

<p>It was CLEARLY in the passage. I remember reading resume around 09176024967 times. lol</p>

<p>@Boston: That was exactly what was on the SAT… They pulled certain sections of it, and that was definitely on it.</p>

<p>yes i put benign</p>

<p>got benign too.</p>

<p>why was “benign” better than “munificent”?</p>

<p>Yes to alleviate i got that</p>

<p>it wasn’t harming anybody… so it’s benign
munificent means generous.</p>

<p>it was harmless; not relaly generous.</p>

<p>@alleviate yes i got that</p>

<p>@boston1993</p>

<p>The first sentence of the paragraph was exactly that. That’s what I was trying to say earlier.</p>