<p>@IFail: The piano player said, “I don’t play accurately, anyone can play accurately, I play with expression.” Your dancer choice would be incorrect because he danced with technical precision (and therefore accuracy), and without emotion (whereas the player played with expression).</p>
<p>did anyone put the ice skater for one of them?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Anyone confirm this? I don’t think this is right</p>
<p>2 questions:</p>
<p>-Movie review passage: the one about who might be offended. I said discerning moviegoers at first, but the tone of her quote was so sarcastic that I changed it to virtually no one. The fact that there is the word “virtually,” (rather than just no one) seems to redeem it from being too extreme.
-Trojan war: the thing about primary purpose. Was it the thing about illustrating how some celebrated events are not verified, or another one I thought was possible, the thing about early ways of recording history?</p>
<p>Wait it was emphatic??? The question was definitely asking about the second passage…</p>
<p>the moviegoers was virtually no one</p>
<p>she was talking about how everyone enjoys indulging in basic movies every now and then, regardless of how fake it may be, or how smart you are</p>
<p>i got less ornate too</p>
<p>
I believe so</p>
<p>dipole, what was the question?</p>
<p>yes, the answer was celebrated but not verified.</p>
<p>Ehh idk I was pretty sure it was asking for Passage 2 because before I read I go and mark which questions are based on Passage 1 and which are based on Passage 2. But of course, I could be wrong. </p>
<p>Anyone know the curve?</p>
<p>@oblivion - that answer is right.</p>
<p>And the questions clearly asks for one! I read it 10 times!</p>
<p>The “getting on the nerve of other girls” was like an ice skater showing off to fluster others.</p>
<p>Movie review: I put virtually no one except Kael herself, since it was mentioned that the fraud “depressed” her.</p>
<p>I put celebrated events.</p>
<p>Thanks hamarabeee!</p>
<p>@Oblivion: That’s what I put? Because they said the two other critics had a colloquial style, so she was not unique because others preferred less ornate language as well.</p>
<p>what was the ornate question?</p>
<p>@oscar wilde: yea, i got it confused. -<strong>- i hate analogies… -3 now -</strong>-</p>
<p>(repeated) @archaeology: the question asked not if theocytus based his “resume” off of homer’s story. It asked what evidence he used to support his theory of “how the war might of happened.” Therefore it is archaeology. </p>
<p>any comments?</p>
<p>for the jump-roping passage, one question asked about how the girl felt when her mother came home. I put B (not A which had something to with idyllic)</p>
<p>It was based on a situation in the passage asking for a situation most similar to it. The choices were like magic trick, complex ice skater, no emotion dancers. It was for black jump rope girl</p>
<p>theimpatientone you combined two answers lol. One was virtually noone and the other was only Kael herself. </p>
<p>I also put celebrated events. </p>
<p>And ■■■ for apparently reading the balanced one wrong -_-.</p>
<p>There’s no way I was one hundred percent sure it was asking about 2.</p>
<p>Critics did not view her objectively. “DISAGREEMANTS” ANSWER WAS A TRAP.</p>