<p>one of them was prolific…trenchant</p>
<p>(for the soccer player/precocious one) I picked unremitting.</p>
<p>How can it be precocious?</p>
<p>the author leaned toward possible in the passage, so it was possible because no proof it’s wrong.</p>
<p>the basset hound was phlegmatic?? or no</p>
<p>Is it agreed upon that the passage about birds/mammals is experimental?</p>
<p>wat was the retiring one?</p>
<p>Agree with prolific/trenchant</p>
<p>I got prolific and trenchant also jmnd3. Clandestine was not one of them right?</p>
<p>Yes, it unremitting. And yes, prolific was right.</p>
<p>@blugblug</p>
<p>i agree that the log did not stimulate ANGER, but it did stimulate HAPPINESS which dissipates anger</p>
<p>did anyone get erudite or astute/probing</p>
<p>anyone get ‘unambitious’ for one?</p>
<p>definitely not precocious, it was unremmitting because the sentence had some synonym of repetition</p>
<p>no, it was prolific. Not erudite. She WAS scholarly. She wasn’t prolific, she didn’t write a lot of works.</p>
<p>don’t remember putting clandestine for any of them</p>
<p>anyone get productive for an answer?</p>
<p>was “nonchalant … unambitious” one?</p>
<p>erudite/incisive vs. astute/probing, i believe it was about harper lee</p>
<p>@tvremote No, it asked about passage 2 in comparison to passage 1.</p>
<p>harper lee- prolific/trenchant for sure…it said she only wrote one book and that the language was sharp</p>