<p>What was the question with ameliorate?</p>
<p>I also had an experimental cr but nothing with disneyland</p>
<p>@cortana “lassitude” and “fix” are experimental I think.</p>
<p>What did you guys put for the question regarding the symbolism of “wading through still and often murky waters”</p>
<p>Also archaeologist or lawyer?</p>
<p>The question was something about two leaders, Ghandhi and martin luther king jr. maybe, “blank social injustice” which i believe is ameliorate. </p>
<p>Also, did anyone get “countenance” as an answer? I believe it was the answer to the last question in one of the sets.</p>
<p>Damn it, I think I put resigned for the vehement/caustic one. 
And I got all the vocab wrong, I’m pretty sure.</p>
<p>LoseYourself: It was the one that was something like this:</p>
<p>Although Malcom X/ MLK both attempted to _______ social injustice, they tried to do so in radically different ways.</p>
<p>I put something like Apprehensively going into another person’s life…</p>
<p>^thats correct</p>
<p>Further explanation on vehement vs caustic</p>
<p>Caustic means criticizing with bitterness, there wasn’t any bitterness in tone
Vehement just means strong and passionate. They were both passionate about the story</p>
<p>@subsidize </p>
<p>I got archaeologist for the question where the other choices were like “spy” and “lawyer” for the question in the arts passage about “human capacity”</p>
<p>Can you give some more context for that question and maybe some answer choices? I do not remember putting ameliorate and I’m almost certain I got all the vocabulary right.</p>
<p>@Paddyws, to clarify “human complexities” was the answer to the last question, but the first question asked what the passage primarily focused on about Baker and that was her “political philosophy” Fair?</p>
<p>what was the archaeologist question?</p>
<p>@cortana: It’s spy, since it has words that imply sneaking around and behind the scenes stuff.</p>
<p>Pretty sure I have a -4 to a -6. How much is that?</p>
<p>@Mascara it was Definitely Archaeologist. Those lines discussed studying “remnants of things” and looking at traces of fragments and drawing conclusions. That’s what an archaeologist does pretty much.</p>
<p>^ agree with cortana</p>
<p>Nuclear Power:</p>
<p>-Both authors agreed that nuclear power has been “controversial”
-Green energy has been tried and “found wanting”
-Both shared an “emphatic” tone
-The second passage was “vehement”
-The first paragraph “alludes to a pivotal event”
-Both passages “invoke collective interest”</p>
<p>Art:</p>
<p>-The piece is “personal and reflective”
-A detour is different from “everyday experiences”</p>
<p>Biography:</p>
<p>-The biographer shares “political values”
-Baker’s “political philosophy” was talked about the most
-Wading into the murky water>>apprehension
-Biographer argues for an “alternate approach”
-She engages in “self-admonition”
-Biographer honored to note “human complexities”
-Biographer is like an “archaeologist”
-Marginalized peoples must participate
-Treatment>>handling
-Human capacity>>Lawyer learning from past mistakes</p>
<p>Fleece:
-He acts “paranoid”
-Narrator is “disappointed”
-Ideas are “independent of conscious thought”
-Fleece touches his head out of “pride”
-Authority figure is a “killjoy”</p>
<p>Blogging:
-Quote “accounts for a phenomenon”
-Passage 1 is “overly optimistic”
-Passage 1 says you can get attention</p>
<p>yep archaeologist</p>
<p>I really think it was “caustic” and not “vehement.” The author CLEARLY despised coal as an energy source and “caustic” means “severely critical”</p>
<p>^cortana, he was passionate not bitter against coal</p>
<p>f I put something like musician change their style…</p>