<p>and are you positive the art passage was “personal and reflective?” I put “cautiously argumentative” because it seemed like he was slightly arguing about arts and i don’t really see how the passage was “reflective.” Personal, perhaps but definitely not “reflective”</p>
<p>at subsidize the sentence said “I wanted to get along”</p>
<p>I put "dedication but now that i think about it, it seems more of “disappointment” ugh. i really want a 750 +</p>
<p>was one of the sentence completion about peacock and feathers, and was the answer plumage or something? </p>
<p>Also was apostasy an answer too?</p>
<p>@cortana431
was stuck between the two, put personal and reflective. can anyone confirm the right answer?</p>
<p>Sonic7 that must’ve been an experimental. It doesn’t sound familiar and all. </p>
<p>@cortana: If we’re using “reflective” to mean contemplative or thoughtful, I think that describes the passage pretty well.</p>
<p>I fully support Subsidize’s list of answers… even though I got a bunch wrong. Lol. Visit page 14 for answers.</p>
<p>The only ones I see so far up for debate are the vehement/caustic and hypothetical/alternative. I think the answer is vehement because the author was judging coal with statistics and wasn’t really bitter about it. I think the answer was alternative because hypothetical seems strange. I honestly don’t know. I got both of them wrong.</p>
<p>@cortana
The question was “Humans have the capacity to use hindsight for foresight” or something. In other words, learning lessons from the past.</p>
<p>was the answer “e”? the hindsight and foresight made me pick it; i don’t remember what the “e” was though.</p>
<p>@Nikanon
personal+reflective is correct</p>
<p>I put “hypothetical” for that question.</p>
<p>I think the answer choices suck overall on the CR. They are really ambiguous for some of them and vague for others. could be better.</p>
<p>What are the other answer choices to the question which had the correct answer, "Both authors agreed that nuclear power has been “controversial” "</p>
<p>Also wasn’t there something like that both authors considered the negative aspects of blah blah. I don’t remember so clearly.</p>
<p>^sour apple, that was two different question I think</p>
<p>Cumulative list so far: </p>
<p>Section 1:
<em>Short: woman who could have become a president</em>
Attitude of respect toward woman.
Showed her strong influence
The guy whom he said the quote to was intent on having an internationally completive business or something along those lines. </p>
<p><em>Short: nature writing</em>
Walden is fundamentally human-centered
Both gains and losses of focusing on nature </p>
<p><em>Nuclear Power Passage</em>
Tone: emphatic
Tone: vehement
Three mile island: pivotal turning point
Both authors invoke “collective interest
Alternative energy has been tried and found wanting
Primary concern: Less harmful to the environment
The passages both agreed that nuclear plants were controversial</p>
<p>Section 2:
<em>Blogging</em>
Some would consider the claims overly optimistic
Explain a phenomenon.
Passage one says that bloggers get a chance to attract attention</p>
<p><em>Art in Life</em>
The highway represents everyday life
Detour: different from life?
Concrete reality vs abstract art
Art’s place in life
Tone: Personal and reflexive
Analogy with a lawyer reusing ideas from a previous case.</p>
<p><em>Roommate</em>
Drew = attracted
Dean = killjoy
Forehead: pride?
Roommate was Paranoid
Roommate’s behavior was eccentric
“I just wanted to be friends: Disappointed
Ideas are independent of human discovery</p>
<p>Section 3:
<em>Ella Baker passage</em>
Most important topic: Baker’s political philosophy
Quote called for an alternative approach
Self-admonition…maybe?
Biographer like an archaeologist
Treatment = Handling
Shaping Baker’s life
Most interested in human complexity
Weighing: considering deeply
Biographer shared Baker’s political goals
Walking through muddy water is analogous to acting “apprehensively.”
Marginalized people must participate</p>
<p><em>Sentence completion</em>
Clever debater even the opponents praised him
Engineers/scientist are to be treated with “wariness”
Advanced ages: longevity
Scientists: edify…reticence
Ameliorate social injustice
Faculty….Emotion
Exacerbate
Recondite
Compelling…formulaic
Mercurial
Fickleness
Digress</p>
<p>For the Walden passage is everyone sure the answer was “appropriately scientific”? I put long and exhausting to read - both “exhaustive” and “exhausting” were written in the passage. </p>
<p>also for the financially _____ answer - what was the question? I forget that one question but remember putting a different answer.</p>
<p>any ideas for -3 and -1(omit)? 750+?</p>
<p>WE’re still not certain about the “vehement” one. Could just as easily be "caustic</p>
<p>And right now I have 4 wrong assuming the list above is correct (I excluded vehement/caustic). What would -4 most likely be?</p>
<p>I couldn’t decide between “handling” and “management”, so I picked something else. Probably a stupid idea… T.T</p>
<p>so far I missed 4…
dang…I’m scared to compare any more answers with u guys
I have to have to get a 740 on this ugh I feel like I’m gonna have to retake…</p>
<p>I just counted…so we already compiled 50 answers
17 more to go
wut r the chances that I don’t miss more than 2 in those 17 questions? :((</p>
<p>what is a -7 on CR? and for the primary concern for the nuke one was the answer D? ( I dont remember the answer choice just the letter)</p>
<p>@pinknotebook: Exhausted and exhaustive were both used in the passage–to describe work opposite that of Walden’s.</p>
<p>or for Walden - humanly centered or whatever…still think it was long/exhausting</p>
<p>Disregard. Apologies.</p>
<p>for the art and life passage,
Concrete reality vs abstract art seems to be the consensus, but was that choice A or B? If i remember correctly, A had something about the world, or the outside world?</p>
<p>minus 7 on CR will probly be a 710-720</p>