<p>Yea i do remember pun, what were the other three choices other than taunt</p>
<p>Cumulative list so far: </p>
<p>Section 1:
<em>Short: woman who could have become a president</em>
Attitude of respect toward woman.
Showed her strong influence
The guy whom he said the quote to was intent on having an internationally completive business or something along those lines. </p>
<p><em>Short: nature writing</em>
Walden is fundamentally human-centered
Both gains and losses of focusing on nature </p>
<p><em>Nuclear Power Passage</em>
Tone: emphatic
Tone: vehement
Three mile island: pivotal turning point
Both authors invoke “collective interest
Alternative energy has been tried and found wanting
Primary concern: Less harmful to the environment
The passages both agreed that nuclear plants were controversial</p>
<p>Section 2:
<em>Blogging</em>
Some would consider the claims overly optimistic
Explain a phenomenon.
Passage one says that bloggers get a chance to attract attention
Something about people being “irked”</p>
<p><em>Art in Life</em>
The highway represents everyday life
Detour: different from life?
Concrete reality vs abstract art
Art’s place in life
Tone: Personal and reflexive
Analogy with a lawyer reusing ideas from a previous case.</p>
<p><em>Roommate</em>
Drew = attracted
Dean = killjoy
Forehead: pride?
Roommate was Paranoid
Roommate’s behavior was eccentric
“I just wanted to be friends: Disappointed
Ideas are independent of human consciousness
Thinking from his navel was a “taunt.”</p>
<p>Section 3:
<em>Ella Baker passage</em>
Most important topic: Baker’s political philosophy
Quote called for an alternative approach
Self-admonition…maybe?
Biographer like an archaeologist
Treatment = Handling
Shaping Baker’s life
Most interested in human complexity
Weighing: considering deeply
Biographer shared Baker’s political goals
Walking through muddy water is analogous to acting “apprehensively.”
Marginalized people must participate</p>
<p><em>Sentence completion</em>
Clever debater even the opponents praised him
Advanced ages: longevity
Scientists: edify…reticence
Ameliorate social injustice
Faculty….Emotion
Exacerbate
Recondite
Compelling…formulaic
Mercurial
Fickleness
Rebutted
Digress
Poisonous/deadly</p>
<p>42/48 I believe</p>
<p>ameliorate was the correct answer for the Malcom X/ MLK on social injustice fill-in.</p>
<p>What do you guys think a -5 CR is?</p>
<p>They both considered the controversy of nuclear power, that was an answer.</p>
<p>Another question had the answer of “they both weighed negative impacts”.</p>
<p>Taunt was also a correct answer.</p>
<p>What’s the point of trying to think of the other choices. It’s obviously taunt.</p>
<p>I hate the Fleece passage. I initially chose “pride” as the thing that was reflected by Fleece’s pointing to his head, but it just seemed that he was insecure throughout – so I chose uncertain. I think way too hard…</p>
<p>@clandarkfire
thanks!</p>
<p>what was the one with the nuclear energy what passage 2 author would say to passage 1 on researching alternative energy?</p>
<p>Wait what do you guys mean by “explain a phenomenon” for the blogging passage. I don’t really remember that question. What were the other choices. Also does anyone remember what the first question for the baker passage was?</p>
<p>I don’t understand how Walden was human centered fundamentally. The passage was talking about how the modern works have evolved into dull, dry, boring works because (and I remember this exact wording) the “problem” was that the writings were too humanly centered and scientific. The youthfulness of Walden is long forgotten; it was youthful and fresh because it had an appropriate amount of science in it, but not too much to drown people in boredom. That’s just the way I see it, but I may be totally wrong.</p>
<p>parody was also an answer choice for the taunt thing</p>
<p>@seahawks</p>
<p>I chose the one that said, to paraphrase, that Author 1 was neglecting the financial implications.</p>
<p>I’m still not sure why most people say otherwise.</p>
<p>so parody, pun and taunt. What were the others. Help needed</p>
<p>rebuttal as well</p>
<p>@seahawk “ameliorate was the correct answer for the Malcom X/ MLK on social injustice fill-in.”</p>
<p>what were the other choices.</p>
<p>I agree, I put something relating to the high cost because the other passage said they poured billions into alternative energy research</p>
<p>Crazy Pluto- exonarate, elaborate…but ameliorate was obviously right</p>
<p>what was the taunt one???</p>
<p>Why was Fleece prideful about his forehead? I completely did not understand that question.</p>
<p>At seahawks, that was the trap answer. The answer was it has been tried because they already poured a ton of money in it.</p>
<p>so taunt, rebuttal, parody, pun. what was final answer</p>