<p>I really think that it sounded more… informative/ researched than anything. haha, this was a silly question.</p>
<p>What do y’all think the curve is gonna be like?
I think i got about 9 wrong…</p>
<p>-3= 800, -10= 700 is what I think it will be, in terms of raw scores. We might even have -4= 800, because I thought this test was way harder than the one I took in May(and had a -4=800 curve)</p>
<p>check out the link neverstopsmiling!</p>
<p>probably around 640-680.</p>
<p>hey was the CR about human space exploration an experimental…?</p>
<p>What is everyone else shooting for?</p>
<p>If the consolidated answers hold, I think I did all right. I’m just praying right now, haha :)</p>
<p>In the 22 critical reading sections that have been released, the passage difficulties were average while the answers were absolutely all about nuances. I say it was def harder than june sat</p>
<p>640??? Damn… that harsh!!!</p>
<p>Yeah, it won’t be that harsh. You’ll have from a 660-690…</p>
<p>Are there any trends? As in are some months always easier and some always harder?</p>
<p>the curve for march of last year was ridiculously good…literally all my friends who took it in march got a 2300+
i wish i took it in march… :(</p>
<p>by -3 do you guys mean 3 questions wrong or like a 64 raw score? If the second option, then 3 wrong would be a -4, right?</p>
<p>What were the two questions (not just the answers) for the Walden Passage?</p>
<p>^yep[evergreen]</p>
<p>1) How would the author view Walden? Human centered
2) Which of these best describes the author’s perspective towards the increased movement of nature writing? Gains and losses</p>
<p>What were the answers to the short passages ABOUT BLOGGING???</p>
<p>Can any of you justify “human centered” with evidence from the text?</p>
<p>You missed the point of the last line. The last line was a reference to the authors forgetting about the human side of the nature. Walden, which defined what should be a genre, was forgotten to a rise in objective, impersonal material.</p>
<p>I missed it too, but I didn’t see the distinction so easily because right in the previous line it said readers are human-centered…so I sent an ambiguity notice to CB that it had too much going on and it was easy to support either human centered or appropriately scientific.</p>
<p>GUYS, WHAT were some of the answers/questions to the two short passages about BLOGGING.</p>
<p>hmm, did any of you remember a question about a new tenant politely, yet firmly ____ her new neighbors efforts to be friendly? i remembered some answers about overture and maneuver, but to be honest, i think that might have been the experimental.</p>
<p>Pretty sure that was experimental; I don’t remember it at all.</p>