<p>I also picked ''artifacts of the knowledge of economy''. I dont remember anything about this.</p>
<p>In the first paragraph it mention uncoated was the most popular type of paper and the rest of the essay supported WHY it was popular.</p>
<p>i scanned the paper for "artifacts of the knowledge of economy" but couldn't find those words in the exact syntax but felt that article might have hinted at that in a way? was a toss up between those two, maybe i just called the wrong side of the coin.</p>
<p>^ That's what I thought too.</p>
<p>The uncoated paper was mentioned in the first paragraph as being popular and the rest of the essay answered WHY it was popular. Right?</p>
<p>Because of this, i chose the artifacts of economic knowledge</p>
<p>It never said why uncoated paper was popular. It said that out of all regular paper, uncoated was the most popular. The rest of the essay talked about why regular paper is used so much, not why uncoated paper was popular.</p>
<p>it talked about why the paper was so used alot (it being uncoated), but never really discussed what made it better than another type of paper. </p>
<p>Can you compare two things (vs.) without addressing one of them? doesn't seem logical to me.</p>
<p>oh crap. Was the answer choice , ''why uncoated paper is better than other types of paper''?</p>
<p>At the same time, the question asked which was not DIRECTLY answered in the text.</p>
<p>I don't think "artifacts of the knowledge economy" were ever discussed...</p>
<p>yeah, it wasn't "why is paper better than computer" or something like it. It said "why is uncoated paper more popular than regular paper?" and the passage never stated why uncoated paper was more popular, just that paper was more popular than computers for those long projects.</p>
<p>it's definitely uncoated paper. it wasnt explained in the first paragraph</p>
<p>It's uncoated paper.. it specifically mentioned "artifacts of knolwedge" in the top right corner.. i'm 100 percent sure</p>
<p>I thought it just mentioned "knowledge workers" in the top right corner.</p>
<p>What is an "artifact of knowledge" anyway? I do know that it talked about knowledge workers (aka white collar jobs pretty much).</p>
<p>artifact was knowledge was mentioned =/
took me quite a few rereads to find it
jeez I hate these questions (so yes, the uncoated paper was correct)</p>
<p>also for that same section there was a q dealing with the first paragraph
was it "to show a statistic" or "provide a false general view" (or something)
if anyone can recall...</p>
<p>I dont remember the exact question, but I remember the answer was that long extensive projects were done on computers (that was the general view that the study proved false)</p>
<p>So "artifacts of the knowledge economy" were definitely mentioned? I finished the rest of the section with a few minutes to spare, and I spent them scanning the passage looking for something about them, but I didn't find anything. Like I said, I definitely noticed "knowledge workers" in the top right corner, but that was it...</p>
<p>Yep.
I remember seeing "artifacts of the knowledge economy." I'm pretty sure it was in like the second/third paragraph or around there.</p>
<p>the social science passage was interesting!</p>
<p>What was it on again lol? Was it the paper one?</p>
<p>poetry one - narrator is most unlike his... teachers right?</p>
<p>and why does he list so many famous authors?</p>