October SAT Math

<p>^I thought it was 3... :(</p>

<p>it wasn't 33/2 for the teams because you had to have 2 or more people on a team and you had 33 people. you can't have half a person on a team
also, you can't leave any people out</p>

<p>i concur with Bigb14</p>

<p>Idk lol...</p>

<p>mdpt problem n=8 amirite?</p>

<p>what's like 2 or 3 wrong and 1 omit? lol</p>

<p>Will 1 wrong be 780?</p>

<ol>
<li>11 (teams with 2 or more ppl)</li>
<li>120 (area of rectangle?)</li>
<li>128</li>
<li>3.2 (a+b)</li>
<li>45 (one of the possible scores he could've gotten)</li>
<li>1/25 (1/a^n)</li>
<li>8</li>
<li>3 (how many areas does f(x)=b)</li>
<li>2200 (number set)</li>
<li>34 (Weird symbol one)</li>
</ol>

<p>In additon we have:</p>

<ol>
<li>(17/2),</li>
<li>abs value of x-32<2,</li>
<li>.5<x<.25</li>
<li>15</li>
<li>b=k</li>
<li>18sqrt3-6pi
( not in any particular order)</li>
<li>the dotted thingy was 10 pi</li>
<li>the roman numeral question was none</li>
<li>3 were the same as f(0)</li>
</ol>

<p>
[quote]
for #16, I got 4.. because f(x)=b also included f(0)..

[/quote]

the question asked for how many were the same. you can't count f(0)</p>

<p>700ish i'm guessing, hopefully there isn't a harsh curve</p>

<p>repost:</p>

<p>is the midpoint question n=8?</p>

<p>I'm hoping 600+. How many wrong/ommitted can you have and still get a 600+?</p>

<p>What was the question for #11 grid-in again? (the answer was 128 but I can't recall the question)</p>

<p>Oh, and what was the answer to the 2 parallel lines, point, P and Q, perpendicular.... thing?</p>

<p>the midpoint n was 17/2 i think</p>

<p>it was the one with the pattern of divide by 2 and x3</p>

<p>yummy mango, the answer was NONE</p>

<p>oh YES! i remember that now </p>

<p>thanks bigb</p>

<p>Can someone explain the midpoint problem with 17/2 as answer. I don't have recolection of that.</p>

<p>why? i did 2^(K+4) = 2^k x 2 ^4 = 16 (2)^K</p>

<p>original is 2^K, so halfway is 8(2^k)</p>

<p>n=8</p>

<p>StrangeIndianFoo, it was none? :D If it is, w00t.</p>

<p>^yes it was none. the points could have been on opposite corners.</p>

<p>Does anyone know which one was experimental? The one with 62 was in the same section as the prime factor (65). was this it?</p>