<p>o okay, thanks.
but wouldn't the answer i put have worked still?</p>
<p>lx+32l > 2</p>
<p>can someone remind me what was the question with the answer 128 in the grid ins?</p>
<p>2/x > 3
the answer was 1/4 <x<1/2
negative ones are wrong directly, and the other positive option was something <x<3/4</p>
<p>no cuz then 3 would be a possible answer</p>
<p>wait i dont remember this pentagon problem. could someone please refresh my memory???</p>
<p>lx+32l > 2 will not work
it converts to
x+ 32 > 2
and 32 + x < 2
both are wrong</p>
<p>Hey I agree that the first elevator answer was 3</p>
<p>But for the second one, didnt it start on 10 and go up and down and finnaly end at 30 0r 40 </p>
<p>Thus the answer was like 20 or 30 something along those lines</p>
<p>okay, i see thanks.
but, the whole wording with "between" can be a little confusing imo. i mean people could have interpreted that differently.</p>
<p>have the SATs ever done for the math like they do for the other sections, where you can get one wrong and still get an 800?</p>
<p>if i got one wrong, does that automatically drop me to a 760?</p>
<p>and would you guys say this years math was relatively easier or harder than past, because that might reveal how they will curve it.</p>
<p>Oh yeah, then i got 2^n. Thanks daman.</p>
<p>zorro it asks the distance traveled not the displacement.</p>
<p>darn</p>
<p>Has anyone figured out the 6<sqrtx<10 problem yet</p>
<p>It has to be 32 but it wasnt a choice...</p>
<p>for the trapezoid question, how did you get 4 for the top segment of the trapezoid in the 3 circles? i tried to confirm that it was 4 but i couldn't find anything to confirm it. 20 was my first guess but it seemed way too easy to be true. you don't KNOW that the top line is 4 (of the trapezoid), and in fact when i looked at it, the endpoints of the top line were on 2 points on the MIDDLE CIRCLE- the distance from these 2 points were NOT on the radius, but when you look at it, it looked slightly shorter than the radius. one of the answers was 16+ 3 square root of 2, which was 16+ 3.73, which made sense. why else would they put an answer with Pi in it?? 20 seemed way too ez</p>
<p>6 < root (n) < 10
36 < n < 100
99 - 37
= 62</p>
<p>jextelox - two equal circles by symmetry divide the radius into half, their point of intersection lies on the perpendicular bisector of the line joining their radii.</p>
<p>oo, I guess it didnt say it had to be an interger</p>
<p>it said so</p>
<p>it's 62
i second that</p>
<p>oh dammit, ur right, ahh dam i didnt see that, ahhhh. that's -2 and an omit for me. UGH> that's 750 for me...AGH</p>
<p>does anyone remember the question about the factors of 40?
did it ask for the factors not divisible by 10 or factors divisible by 10?</p>
<p>not divisible by 10.</p>