<p>The reason I ruled out your answer was it seemed like it should be something like "Even with ONLY two articles..." I felt the meaning wasn't clear in that particular answer. However, I think you're right. But the bio one is def. wrong, so I think you're good.</p>
<p>yeah... thats why i was hesitant at first to select it... but then i think "even with only" and "even with" can be taken to mean the same thing. like "even with a 8-8 record, the team made the playoffs." i dont know. whatever. WR is stupid.</p>
<p>what did you think about CR? do you remember any tricky ones?</p>
<p>CR seems good...I think. I got my 3 questionable vocabs (verve, obdurate, diffident/aloof) right, so that was a huge plus. I struggled with the passage one that was "generated," but I put that in the end and that seems right. There was also one in the father/daughter one about modern being in quotes...I put the answer that had to do w/ it not being ironic, which I think was confirmed as being right later on.</p>
<p>I am fuzzy on that physics guy passage...I was shaky on 1 or 2 of the questions in that passage and I don't know if I ever got them confirmed. That passage really didn't stay with me, and I think I'd need the answers to identify whether or not I put them. What did you put for the one about the purpose of the last paragraph in the physics one?</p>
<p>Other than that I think I am OK. What else was tough for you? I may be forgetting something, or a few somethings...</p>
<p>i got the CR ones you mentioned.</p>
<p>I'm really hoping that I nailed the CR sections on deception and the one on the trinidad lady. </p>
<p>Cuz I'm pretty sure I missed two on the house/physics passage. ONe that I missed was what is true about both the father and the daughter... I put that they were both hesitant to speak openly about what should be done to the house... apparently it should have been... they were both sensitive to eachother's feelings. the other one I missed was on the physics passage... it was about what does the word "shattered" imply... I think I put the degree to which they were uncomfortable about discussing something... should have been degree to which their past conclusions had been discredited.</p>
<p>the house passage... hmm... what did you put for the one that asked, what can be inferred from the following lines, and then the lines gave a description of how old houses didn't have views of the outside. i put modern houses include views of the outside. I hope that's all the tricky ones for this passage...</p>
<p>the physics one... hmm.. the question about the last passage? i think i put to demonstrate a method used by Feyman or something like that?</p>
<p>"ONe that I missed was what is true about both the father and the daughter... I put that they were both hesitant to speak openly about what should be done to the house... apparently it should have been... they were both sensitive to eachother's feelings."</p>
<p>I am not sure what I put for that one. I believe I put the answer that you said is correct, but I am not positive.</p>
<p>I got the correct answered for the "shattered" one.</p>
<p>I put the same answer for the house one. Other people said that earlier too, so I think that is right.</p>
<p>And I have no idea whether or not I put that one about the physics passage. It escapes me. :)</p>
<p>What about the one on deception that was either judgmental or something else...I THINK I put judgmental, but I fought w/ that one for a bit too. Do you remember what was being argued against judgmental?</p>
<p>yeah i put judgmental... people were arguing things like speculative/analytical. i fought between judgmental/analytical. i dont think speculative applies cuz the guy didnt suggest this "would happen"... he said this "does happen"... which made him judgmental. i think judgmental is right.</p>
<p>SWEET. Alright now I know I got it right. I was debating b/w speculative and judgmental and put judgmental. One down!</p>
<p>Alright, well I think that pretty much covers it. Got some anxiety out...haha.</p>
<p>But I've got to get reading some Crime and Punishment, so thanks for the help and good luck!</p>
<p>cool cool...everything so far seems to be in order...but one thing that there was debate in was that marriage question</p>
<p>I was stuck btw morality/intergrity and complex personlity....I chose morality and this kid who got 800 in verbal confirmed that to me today...so idk what you think? I put morality, because the passage was about how the women stayed true to the man over time.</p>
<p>the consensus on here was that it is complex personality. after all, it said something along the lines of that she had many sides to her, which is indicative of a complex personality.</p>
<p>so have we reached consensus on what math exp. was??</p>
<p>section 6 </p>
<p>10 characters</p>
<p>haha refreshen my mind what was on section 6 (that seemed to be tricky)
thanks</p>
<p>"Remembered some insanely easy ones:
Y=45
R=m/t
Hypotenuse in the 30-60-90 =24
I think the guy traveled 20 miles in 30 minutes? There was some question like that"</p>
<p>wasn't it m/h? to get speed in mph?</p>
<p>hmm my mind is blank. lol thanks though :)
(Btw section 6 didnt include the trapezoid, or the colored marbles/cards or whatever did it?)</p>
<p>DiGramma... were there really 2 viable options for that? like did they have both R=m/t and R=m/h.... i just remember there being one obvious one. I don't think they defined both t and h for us.</p>
<p>To SoL: don't stress, you def. got the house one right. You said you put something like "they weren't true about their feelings to each other" which is basically the same thing as "they were not honest w/ each other because they wanted to please the other person"</p>
<p>Digamma, stop stressing: it is unequivocally m/h ; there was not retarded t variable like I said in a previous post</p>
<p>The one about marriage was 100% "to show her complex nature"</p>
<p>haha i wish man... i think there were 2 different options... like one was they were both hesitant to speak openly about what they felt should be done to the house (that's what I picked). the other was "they were both sensitive to each other's feelings (or something like this... this was the right answer I guess.)"</p>
<p>as a side note... what did you think of the chemicals question that was discussed earlier... like the set of small passages that discussed chemical use in farming... what would the author of passage 2 consent to? I put less chemicals... some one was making a case for "if higher yielding crops are used, pesticides wouldn't be nececssary." i don't think he ever said pesticides would never be necessary.. he was just advocating the use of chemicals effectively instead of widely... comments?</p>
<p>I still think the tone of the deception one might have been analytical. If we define tone as the style or manner of expression in writing, then we can see that passage two was more analytical because his passage actually describes what happens to interpersonal relationships when a partner lies. Just my two cents, but judgmental sounds veritable as well.</p>
<p>It was less chemicals, more EFFECTIVE usage of them. The guy came out and said it in the passage.</p>
<p>was that the question with market forces as a choice, SoL?</p>