<p>Lol sara12 dont worry, curve should be around 50-52 for a 5. 55% for a 5 isnt too bad.</p>
<p>if anyone wants to talk about the test, [Faillllllll</a> chat group - dwbhafubwurbauirbuesfesfefesfesfs](<a href=“http://xat.com/Faillllllll]Faillllllll”>xat Faillllllll chat)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I did. 
:)</p>
<p>I’m in the same boat as Sara12. I felt like the past 7 years’ free response didn’t come close to the difficulty of this year’s. The curve better be really nice.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Oh, I didn’t realize without the indefinite article in front of ‘calc’. That makes more sense :D</p>
<p>You could have also used to calculate mu (coefficient of friction).</p>
<p>^No a 55-60 percent is a 5</p>
<p>This year was sooooooo hard compared to previous years. Hey guys, u think a 25 MC and a 20-25 FRQ is a 5?</p>
<p>^ easily. Thats like what? 52-57.</p>
<p>Didnt everyone think the last frq was the easiest?</p>
<p>^Easier than the first 2, lol, which were blah.</p>
<p>^very very true</p>
<p>SMH SMH SMH SMH at the free response</p>
<p>^same here.
Mech FRQ was killer, and mech MC was killer as well…</p>
<p>E&M i thought was relatively easy but Mechanics… :(</p>
<p>Hmmm, did anyone see any patterns in their MC? I didn’t.</p>
<p>The Mech FRQ was intimidating at first but once I stopped panicking and cleared my head wasn’t that bad (except for the end of question 1–that really was that bad…). On the multiple choice I was really pressed for time and barely had time to go back and work out the questions I skipped the first time around, let alone check over my answers afterward. All in all it didn’t go as well as I had hoped.</p>
<p>the last two parts in the first question made no sense</p>
<p>^You’re not the only one who thought that when they read those…</p>
<p>the third question is going to give me that 5 on the exam; it saved me.</p>
<p>i found the MC extremely easy. First time around only skipped over 3 questions and was able to fill them in on the second go. all in all i don’t expect more than 3 wrong. but the FR, I’ve never seen anything like it. the last two parts of the 1st question, the integration for the 2nd, and all of the third except for the first part and the graph were brutal. If I’m lucky i’ll get 23 points on it. but i presume I won’t get any less than 19. do you think 19 on the FR with a 30-32/35 on the MC is enough for a 5?</p>
<p>Lol are you seriously asking if almost 100% on MC is a five? Get out of here.</p>
<p>32/35 is 91, not 100. and even then. with how badly I believe I did on the FR, nothing is guaranteed. I quite literally need a 5 on it to meet my condition for my college. I don’t know if it’s just because oscillations are my weakest (when having to work with them in terms of equations of oscillation) or if it was something else, but I found the 3rd question insanely difficult.</p>