Official December SAT I Forum

<p>wait, what was the reading about? u remember?</p>

<p>so are you FOR SURE that "intervening in" is "in" and not "with"??? the sentence sounds retarded with in.</p>

<p>umm I don't really remember..</p>

<p>I am hoping for the collegeboard to throw this question away.</p>

<p>Yes, I know, I am selfish (not literally). loll</p>

<p>i was talkin about the first section............
either you or I am reallyyyyyyyyy screwed..lol
was your reading about the government thing?> (cuz I didn't read that and someone told me that section 3 was about that)</p>

<p>So what was the answer to the "oppressive and uniform" and "mysterious and unknown"?</p>

<p>Can anyone tell me which questions were in experimental math?</p>

<p>did anyone have a grid response with a triangle and a triangle inscribed in it with an altitude dropped from the inner triangle asking for one of the inner triangles (or part of the outer triangles) side lenght? was that experimental?></p>

<p>dagger345, I didn't have that question so I think it was experimental.</p>

<p>What was the CR question where answer C was "severe" and E was "analytical" ? I think it was C, but I put E on the test. I kept changing my answer, lol.</p>

<p>Also, which section was experimental CR?
I had Nixon/Cold War, Lewis/Canoe trip, comic books...and something I can't remember.</p>

<p>And for the bird question on writing, I put C "even with" because "even with the slightest variation" sounded like redundancy. I thought it could have just been "with the slightest variation." Thoughts?</p>

<p>"Szenchen cooking requires that one cook without interruption" Is cook supposed to be cooks!? I put A for this answer choice.</p>

<p>one is singular..</p>

<p>nixon/cold war</p>

<p>so are you FOR SURE that "intervening in" is "in" and not "with"??? the sentence sounds retarded with in.</p>

<p>i'm repeating this question</p>

<p>chinchilla: I put severe. Nixon is the experimental.</p>

<p>"so are you FOR SURE that "intervening in" is "in" and not "with"??? the sentence sounds retarded with in."</p>

<p>Yeah, it sounds stupid either way but I think "in" fits better in the context than "with."</p>

<p>I'm pretty sure the Nixon one was experimental because I had the math experimental section and I didn't see a reading passage about Nixon anywhere. </p>

<p>Could someone explain the question about the telephone company in the math grid-in section? I think it went: </p>

<p>"For Cost A, you have to pay $1 for the first 20 minutes, then $0.07 for the rest of the time. Cost B = $0.06 per every minute. At what time (t) are the two costs equal if t > 20?"</p>

<p>People who did "not" have math experimental, please tell me which problem do you remember: The one with the Ven Diagram (hopefully experimental) or the one with the Red, White, Blue? Please reply!</p>

<p>I got the Venn Diagram wrong, I put 7 when the answer was 10. I forgot that you had to add up the 2 intersection points rather than 1.</p>

<p>ivis:
A) 1 + .07(t-20)
B) .06t
set the two equations equal to each other, solve for t.
t=40</p>

<p>I remember having both the Venn Diagram and Red/White/Blue....sorry, aszx. I could be wrong though.</p>

<p>What about math question with isosceles triangle? I put E. It had a bunch of inequalities (which one cannot be true)...with x, y, z, A, B, C...</p>

<p>Yeah, it was E - "y = z"</p>

<p>mitsu: Thanks a bunch! I read the question wrong - I thought it was $1 for every minute up to 20 instead of a total of $1 for the first 20 minutes. There goes my 2400 lol.</p>