<p>Bump bump.</p>
<p>anyone remeber anyQ anymore, i think we are al brain dead now? was time an isue for ug guyz?</p>
<p>Guys... TO make you sleep better, this is the curve break down: (From the June 2005 test). I'm 100% sure that one raw pt off was a 770, and that two/3 wrong was a 750. I also know a friend who got like 6 wrong and a 700, so... </p>
<p>800 (0 wrong)
770 (1 Wrong)
760
760
750
740
730
730
720
710
680
680</p>
<p>What about 20 wrong?</p>
<p>how trustworthy do think that curve is , Gerneral Rak?</p>
<p>bump (10 char)</p>
<p>20 wrong.. 620?</p>
<p>I'd like to disagree with that curve. The November curve was more or less 2-5 wrong was an 800 still, and if you look in prep books (e.g., PR, Barron's) as well as CB's own SATII book, you'll see that you can get a perfect score and miss around that many problems. I'd be surprised if this curve is as harsh as you suggested, IHATESAT.</p>
<p>yea, the curve cannot be that harsh. Normally ur allowed to miss 5 and can still end up with an 800, that is if you answered all the 85 questions.</p>
<p>bumpy bump</p>
<p>last time i left 10 blanks and got 730. this time i think i should at least got 780</p>
<p>how many do you think you missed this time?</p>
<p>shiitt man 2 more days for some reason i have a baadd feeling</p>
<p>I know. 20 wrong is going to be sooo bad.. like a 650 or something.</p>
<p>this time i left 2 blanks and maybe 4 wrong</p>
<p>December SAT I/II chatroom: dec3sat</p>
<p>From 1-5 AM and beyond. Good luck, everyone!</p>
<p>720 :mad: :mad:</p>
<ol>
<li>was expecting 640 so yeah...><</li>
</ol>
<ol>
<li>About what I figured, but a 790 or 800 sure would have been nice :)</li>
</ol>
<p>I got a 780!!!
I was expecting a 600.</p>