<p>I put snide. He called them an army and put together some words beforehand that, to me, made the group sound silly/dumb. It didn’t sound like it was about minute details or formalisms so much as he didn’t agree with them and thus made a snide comment about them.</p>
<p>He was clearly mocking the army which is the definition of snide.</p>
<p>What was the one in the University passage, it was the last question i think…something like “what did the 2 passages agree in?” I narrowed it down to D/E</p>
<p>for the rhetorical strategy in the University passage, was it repetition, or ironic?</p>
<p>repetition</p>
<p>repitition or angelogical?</p>
<p>I didn’t get either repetition or analogous. He wasn’t comparing anything extremely unsimilar</p>
<p>I put analogous reasoning.
One of the question, was it grueling or diverted?!?! I put diverted</p>
<p>Yes he was, he was comparing teaching actual info vs morals. What about the university one in the parantheses? I dont think it was mock, i said it was just to refute a point.</p>
<p>Really worried. Already know I got mollified wrong. I had 4 CR sections, so one was experimental. One was extremely easy and one was extremely difficult. Anyone know which one was real?</p>
<p>Repitition. And I remember getting snide for an answer. Btw in the Pakistani girls passage, was the grandma being described as “adamant” or a “bully”? I put adamant since she was holding the bed back and not moving. Pretty sure that was right.</p>
<p>And did the university 2 passages agree that something can lead to civil works?</p>
<p>adamant and bully were different questions</p>
<p>@bluedevils that’s what i got. because the author of passage 1 briefly mentioned that there was the possibility of someone’s behavior being influenced by a teacher</p>
<p>For the sentence completion question that was like "His paintings classification was _____… because of his eclectic paintings.</p>
<p>@bluedevils Yea the answer was “Formal course work can lead some students to gain civic…”</p>
<p>For the illusion in art passage, was ‘stalk’ used to mean ‘grab hold of’ or to follow stealthily (the answer wasn’t quite follow stealthily, but it was similar). I am pretty sure it was grab hold of, even though grab hold of isn’t the definition of stalk. If you replaced ‘stalk’ with the stealthy/soft answer, it didn’t make any sense.</p>
<p>For the university passage I said both authors agreed that the faculty’s main job was intellectual teaching and what not. The first definitely though so, and the second actually said so. The only difference is that the second thought that they could also get students to work together for civics and other things.</p>
<p>I put they both agreed that moral, social, etc was just as important as education, because passage 1 i thought agreed with Passage 2, except passage 1 didn’t think it was practical</p>
<p>does anyone remember the reading passage with the “retrieve” vocab question? (does it mean recover or remember?) and in that same passage, what was the other vocab in that section?</p>
<p>also for the critics was it really snide? I was leaning towards pedantic…</p>
<p>let’s make it simple Tinychat:[a71ol</a> - Tinychat](<a href=“http://tinychat.com/a71ol]a71ol”>Live video chat rooms, simple and easy. - Tinychat)</p>
<p>wait actually for readi32651, i think i actually went with the ans that said formal course work can contribute to ppl being good civics…</p>
<p>@SAT100 that was elude something I think</p>
<p>And also there was the choice between stultified and bracing … and</p>
<p>that was choice E… but I put B … dont remember the choice though something confusing?</p>