<p>Well no one has made a writing thread yet, so I thought I would make one.</p>
<p>Don't think anyone remembers, but on section 10 #9, does anyone remember which answer choice was correct? It was about the invention of cinder-blocks or something.</p>
<p>I accidentally made an error and skipped that question. By the time I realized, I had just enough time to fix the bubbling errors and bubble in an answer that just looked right lol.</p>
<p>I thought I did decent on the essay. My examples were polio vaccination, civil rights act of 1965, and the Magna Carta. I couldn't really think of any literary works to help support my view.</p>
<p>For the essay, I filled out 2 pages with 4 paragraph, talking about how FDR’s new deal struck each problems down by promoting progress and Dr. House’s team calling for progress by treating symptoms and reducing one problem at a time …</p>
<p>This essay was better than my Clark kent essay talking about why discipline is needed</p>
<p>lol. Do you remember what you put down for #28 and 29 of the writing section?</p>
<p>Wasn’t #28 the one about the scientist creating a bacteria to use on the experiment? I remember picking “for use on” or something as the answer.</p>
<p>For 29 I was stuck between a and b. Part of the sentence was "…understand fully, in part because. I chose B “in part”. I thought it should’ve been partly.</p>
<p>@inject Really? Damn, I got that one wrong. I spent so much time checking my first 11 (because half of the answers were B) that I didn’t have too much time left for the rest.</p>
<p>I put either B or D (cant remember, i think D?) one was ambiguous it said something like "Rubbing a needle on a magnet will make it magnetic. I thought the “it” was ambiguous so I put the other one</p>
<p>I am not super pleased with my essay. I said that progress is replacing big problems we find unacceptable with smaller problems we find more acceptable. Used cellphones, computers, and cars as examples. Cellphones: solved communication problems, we accept higher levels of stress and vehicle accidents as a result. Computers, we trade instant access to knowledge for privacy invasion and viruses. Cars, we trade faster travel for the risk of injury in an accident. I had to rush a lot though and I didn’t have much of a conclusion. It sounds much more articulate explaining it here than it did while I was trying to write it.</p>
<p>What was the question that had “understand fully”??? because everyone is talking about that one… I am positive I got it right and could help but can’t remember it.</p>
<p>ARobins it was #29, or the last identifying error question. </p>
<p>@purple, I am glad you remember “understand fully” too. What did you put as the answer? I figured since it said “understand fully” the part after the comma should’ve been “partly” rather than “in part”.</p>