<p>Well I figured both of them fought for economic rather than political (not sure though) so I eliminated that one.</p>
<p>I do remember that one of the groups (either AFL or Knights) did not let unskilled laborers into the group, but I couldn't remember if it was the AFL or Knights, which ****ed me off because I had it memorized a few days go. But because I couldn't eliminate this one, another one (which I forgot...) had me guessing on a 50/50 whim during the last seconds of the test.</p>
<p>ughi put the economic/political one...as justification i also knew that another reason the AFL had more success than the Kknights was becasue they had less demands...</p>
<p>basically only like the 8 hour workday while the Knights of labor fought for like woman and children and stuff</p>
<p>yeah, the AFL fought for the more basic and easily winnable goals of unions, like shorter days and better wages. so i put the economic one. </p>
<p>klogon- i had noooo idea on that one about why puritans were called congregationalists, but I never skip questions (not very smart, i know), and I think I put something about the church making decisions within the congregation, not from bishops.</p>
<p>And the sit-in in 1960--at first i thought youth activism, but in 1960 wasn't there a sit-in organized by the AFL-CIO?...and didn't student activism become prevalent in the late 1960s, 70s</p>