***OFFICIAL MAY 2015 SAT THREAD (US ONLY)***

@Xebaism I wasn’t sure for that one but I got four no errors besides that.

What was last the question about the character passage where they make a comparison? I think it was either a sculptor choosing right rocks or actor having few emotions/gestures

@xigjii It definitely wasnt inspiration

@xigjii wasn’t the answer something like deserves more scientific study

@vmiller7723 I said takes for granted that his readers will believe the chewed earpiece is significant and not just incidental

Man those CR passages are so bland and BORING

@daw3iy: I put actors having few emotions because I remember a specific line in the passage said that characterization is about quality not quantity

@daw3iy actor having few gestures

@WhatDat I don’t think that was it, those lines weren’t meant to be focused on the chewed earpiece, it weant deeper than that

@FutureDoctor2028 @xigjii I think I put unexpected something

@Aegon6 well one i have a pretty good memory hehe and 2. and I think the grammar was that her becoming the president after she’s returned is addressed in the same verb tense… you somehow need to indicate that she would become the president AFTER she’s returned. so that’s why I marked “became” D as the error

does anyone remmeber the video

and foam passages questions

for the mystery passage, what is the least likely way to describe the inspector? choices were: thoughtful, erratic, tense, etc…

@Aegon6 @FutureDoctor2028 yeah it was unexpected. Because it said something like for all its frothiness and then like foam is “actually” very important or something

and DNA questions

@daw3iy Erratic. The inspector was not erratic at all.

I got erratic for that one, it means random.
Did anyone get inhibitions for the last question on the first CR passage

Did anyone have a math where there was a chart for x and f (x) and when x was 0 f (0)=18 and f(7)=-3? There was more stuff but can’t remember. The question was like what is f(6). Hope this was experimental

@FutureDoctor2028 I remember the lines being about the author talking about how that detail is so significant and will resonate with the readers because of how it captures the detective’s character… that’s him assuming that the detail (which is the chewed earpiece) will indicate something significant to his readers just as it was significant for him. that’s an assumption and something he’s taking for granted