***OFFICIAL MAY 2015 SAT THREAD (US ONLY)***

16 was answer to two of the math questions i think. one was the area of a square with 3 triangles, and the other was the length of side AB in like a mashed up triangles.

So the digital vs film thing was experimental? Does it count towards your score?

That grid in q was bs, spent so long checking it because I thought you couldn’t grid in zero. Eventually I put zero in the second box, hopefully that’s ok.

@GaBoy19: I knew it had to be 0! It seemed like a trick question to me

Any grammar / maths? So far only 1 down on both, still hoping for 2300+

@WhatDat I would say math was harder than usual - anybody agree? I usually get 800s on my practice tests but I got the flower grid-in wrong. :frowning:

I agree its most likely 0. Just seems like contestable question given the first answer slot had no room for 0

not it was not

Number 20 on one of the maths was 8 right? the one with the 30-60-90 triangle

@ unhackable102 the video game was no exp

@GaBoy19 yeah I remember putting 8 but someone else said 16.

@sat7777 it was not experimental because I had it and I had a math experimental. The answer was like passage 1 takes a side and passage 2 questions the premise of the argument. Also, does anyone know how precise the SAT scantrons are? I erased and changed a lot of answers, can I count on the scantron system to be reliable?

@vmiller7723 did you erase completely? Even if its faded, its fine as long as you put another full dark answer.

@FutureDoctor2028 something minus 3

what did u guys say for absolute value math grid in

@crazycolleg9089 4.5

was it resonance or discovery
oh and what did u get for m^-9
line of best fit x-18
the video one - was it they used a citation? the first one chooses a side - second one questions about why there even is a arugemnt? what was the question about the person who started the argument was it fruitful, productive, extensive or idk? there was another question i forgot…

Yeah the math was the hardest SAT math I’ve taken. I skipped several questions. Seriously considering taking the ACT in June.

I got 2 35 minute writing sections. I’ve done numerous practice tests and know that that is DEFINITELY not supposed to happen. Was the writing section with the “corroborate instead of collaborate” the experimental, or was it the other one? My first writing section was section 3, and my second one was section 7. I’m worried because I was so sure that section 7 was experimental that I cooled down a little.

it seems like nobody had the 1700s Virginia passage so I can say for sure that video was experimental too. I did not have it. It seems like there were 2 reading experimentals