Was idiosyncratic right?
yes idiosyncratic was right.
So after all the debate, were there 4 or 5 No Errors? For the record I got 5.
When is the new SAT coming out? I want to sign up for the one after the June one but not sure what month.
I can’t believe I missed invective and pregnancy. Seems like I always give away the easy ones.
There were 4 I strongly believe @Arpeggio206 by the way, was that section 3 or 6?
Section 6
A lot of people at my school were discussing that section. They kind of agreed it was 4 because one answer choice said “traditional baked dish” instead of “traditionally baked dish”
But wouldn’t traditional be used to describe the noun and not the verb?
Traditional was not really modifying the noun but the verb “baked” if you really thought about it. But that question was towards the end so it’s no surprise it was that tricky
I said traditional for that one but I still got 5 NEs…
@Yakisoba for the question about musical instruments, did you put “than they could with” or “than they can”?
- for the flamingoes question, was known for or known to the underlined thing?
- for the stamp question, why would after stamp prices rise be wrong? After stamp prices have risen implies that the prices rose and then stopped, but ‘stamp prices rise’ seems more general, i.e. It would apply if prices rose multiple times
- does anyone know the exact wording for the collaborate/corroborate question?
So did u guys put something about inhibition or something with ebb or flow?
Yes the question was like, " The wave rising and breaking refers to?" i but inhibitions for that one
whats the link to the google docs?
I am the only one who put 2 delete passages??? They both seemed really unnecessary
Actually thinking back to the test, I got the traditional question right and still got 5 No Errors.
Also was it ‘could’ or ‘can’?
And @jsweets17 … one of them was and one of them wasn’t