***OFFICIAL MAY 2015 SAT THREAD (US ONLY)***

Did you guys get whimsical as a vocab answer, discovery for the mystery thing, taking a patient’s DNA without his consent or something, and impartial narrator for the actors thing?

@ASAP123 that is correct

To those who didn’t have Maths experimental: Did you have 6^a x 6^b = 6^c / 6^d as the last question of the non-grid in 20 question 25 minute section? It’s answer was d = c-a-b.

For those who had Maths experimental, it was Section 4. Was that experimental?

@MarcoReus I don’t think I had that question.

I disagree cause there’s no context of the guy being an actor

Also I put emphatic for the directors speech

And which reading passage is experimental?

Why wasn’t the one about selling stamps an idiomatic error?they sell stamps at domestic level prices vs they sell stamps for domestic level prices.

@MarcoReus That was on an experimental; I got writing experimental and I don’t remember that question. Unless you’re an international…

Did you get showy but apparently sincere for the director?

Can someone explain why it is not “for”?
Ex. I sell apples for 3 dollars a pound.

IS IT PARK AS OR JUST PARK?

@asap123 yes

@Asutosh11 I had park as

Was the “traditional” writing question the one that tested redundancy? Because I recall circling “traditional” as an error in one of the writing questions.

Traditional was wrong because it should be used as the adverb “traditionally”

HI CAN SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME IF THE CR SECTION ABOUT HISTORICAL PHOTOGRAPHS WAS EXPERIMENTAL CAUSE IT WAS HELLA HARD AND I DIDN’T HAVE TIME TO FINISH IT
really hoping it was experimental cause I left 6 questions blank there
can someone please answer, much appreciated

@schoolisfunforme it’s not saying that the narrator was literally an actor- the narrator was simply describing the actors’ thoughts and feelings from their perspective

Oh. I must have gotten the right answer for the wrong reason, then, because I somehow thought it was redundant. Lol…

Why was the stamps one no error? Shouldn’t it have been “for” instead of “at”