<p>i had 3 no errors in a row.. 26,27,28 and so i changed the need not buy to an error... so i had it as.</p>
<p>no error, 26
need not buy, 27
and no error, 28</p>
<p>i had 3 no errors in a row.. 26,27,28 and so i changed the need not buy to an error... so i had it as.</p>
<p>no error, 26
need not buy, 27
and no error, 28</p>
<p>can you get an 800 with skipping 1 in math</p>
<p>did anyone choose the vocab word "euphoria" as an answer for the sentence completions?</p>
<p>Eli90, if you mean euphonious, then yes</p>
<p>yes, was plethora a correct answer also?</p>
<p>what would my score be around if i did as follows?:</p>
<p>CR: 4 wrong, 2 omitted
W: 2-3 wrong. essay 10 or 12
M: 2, maybe 3 wrong, 1 omitted</p>
<p>plethora was correct, yes</p>
<p>GreenDay,</p>
<p>CR ~ 700
W ~ mid 700s
M~ low 700s</p>
<p>@silverdragon:
DEFINITELY "need not buy" is CORRECT, which means NO ERROR. this is because if it were "needs" it should be followed by a direct object or verb in the infinitive form.</p>
<p>@rssll5:
i had 27E, 28D (i think...), and 29E</p>
<p>what was the paucity question? paucity was the answer right?</p>
<p>bleucheeseza, what were 27 and 29?</p>
<p>yes paucity was the answer</p>
<p>27: "edmund sedgewick"? sorry i forgot the name... it was talking about a woman who wrote a book or something... dang, sorry i don't remember at all.</p>
<p>29: someone... need not buy.</p>
<p>im really bugging out
my math mistakes were all beyond avoidable.
but alas, i got 4 wrong.</p>
<p>what do you think that score is</p>
<p>with 4 wrong, maybe 700.</p>
<p>Ren--
"ok, you're all scaring me here, what i interpret, i might be wrong, was that 4000< 3500+x< 4500
the question is WHAT IS ONE POSSIBLE VALUE OF X, or was it THE LEAST POSSIBLE VALUE OF X?
omg, im freaking out, i think i only read the word POSSIBLE,and i put 1111, since its possible,but not least,someone plealse tell me it's ONE POSSIBLE.."</p>
<p>i definitely thought it was one possible value. oh frick.</p>
<p>it was one possible</p>
<p>really?!?!?!?</p>
<p>no, it was LEAST POSSIBLE. therefore it was 1001.
i can bet $100 that it said LEAST POSSIBLE.</p>
<p>kaibop, the error was with familiar to, because the correct idiom is "familiar with." i actually got lucky with that one since a history teacher kept saying "familiar with" like 5 times in a row while reviewing for ap exams and i know he uses correct grammar all the time.</p>