---Official May 3rd Sat Thread---

Test Preparation
141

<p>yeah, I think all the topics were the same</p>

142

<p>O yeah, also that one in writing about never imagining he would ever see him again. It was D right (seeing)???</p>

<p>I believe I got 2 no errors. =O</p>

143

<p>techonolgy lool
i cited
-Supersize me (lol)
-Walden and Thoreau
-Mercy Otis Warren</p>

<p>yup i got 2 no errors</p>

144

<p>@silverdragon, yes again haha</p>

145

<p>did anyone get fundamental for simple?</p>

146

<p>arghhh. i was gonna put D "seeing" and then switched to no error.</p>

147

<p>and yup i put seeing</p>

148

<p>what was the sentence? i said no error for the seeing one because i couldn't figure out what was wrong. ugh</p>

149

<p>just like how I was going to put "less evenhanded", but switched to "less accusatory" lol</p>

150

<p>and yup i got fundamental
haha i love how this thread is going so fast, we're all so jittery!! :D
and grrrrrrrr! 60 second rule--i bet it was put in place juts because of us SATers?</p>

<p>it should be would see
just like it is "5 years **would **pass"</p>

151

<p>what did u guys put for that question "mean" for the sublime passage. the choices were like base, stingy, etc</p>

152

<p>ahhh for the cube one, am i talking about the right one or the wrong one? I put 27v which was an mc. Right?</p>

153

<p>i put base, cause stingy means like cheap in my world. lol</p>

154

<p>the answer was base; its been discussed like 10 times in a nother thread so i think it is base which is what i put</p>

<p>OKAY WHAT DO U THINK OF -1 WRITING IS THAT STILL AN 800 :(
and stingy does mean cheap it is base</p>

155

<p>ah haha no, racerboi. it was a fill-in question. i got math experimental and i'm wondering if that was part of the experimental section.</p>

156

<p>I got 'could' instead of 'would'. I also got fundamental, did you guys get 2 no-errors total, or just for that section?</p>

157

<p>well. i only got 1 writing. so yeah 2 in total</p>

158

<p>did get you the people publicly denounced for the double passage</p>

159

<p>2 no errors total, yup
and could instead of would? haha, doesn't matter =P
and wasn't the "seeing" question experimental?</p>

160

<p>Was there an experimental CR?</p>