<p>I put “What were her feelings about the house?” but I was confused on the question.</p>
<p>I also said the passage answered how she felt about the house</p>
<p>For the question about the graphite: Was it “the messiness of the creative process” or “showed the truth behind artists’ lives” (something along these lines)? And for the homeotherapy passage “it can be inferred that both passages”- “state that experimental procedures are difficult”?</p>
<p>What did royal wrists mean?</p>
<p>A haughty command or (there was something else can’t remember)?</p>
<p>What was the “Dutiful Daughter” all about?</p>
<p>I put messiness of the creative process.</p>
<p>For the homeotherapy one I put that both had people to claim it worked or something like that.</p>
<p>wait is the answer haughty command for that question?</p>
<p>Hey guys,
For the roman numeral one, why would the difference between the terms be 2^n n=positive? My math textbooks have always said that difference is subtraction. So the difference between 2 and 3 would be -1? And since the terms were like 3, 7, 16 or something like that, couldn’t I say that the difference between 7 and 16 is equal to a negative number? Which would make the II statement false because you can only get positive numbers with 2^n n= a positive number. </p>
<p>It’s haughty command because aunt and mom were not considering about the author’s opinion.</p>
<p>last CR (punctuation)
- What do both authors agree on written language - is it that it can express thoughts clearly?
- what would author 2 say about niceties - would he say it prevents creativity? (there was one with effective workplace but that sounded too specific)</p>
<p>Dutiful daughter means what the author felt herself like IMO</p>
<p>@acefromspace I said that writing isn’t static. The second talked about the changing styles of writing and asked if we even needed punctuation in the beginning. The first talked about how dickens did hella cool stuff without punctuation</p>
<p>Both authors agree that it is not static. and author 2 said it was due to poor thinking.</p>
<p>For homeotherapy I put it had worked in some cases. Both passages stated that.</p>
<p>Dutiful Daughter one showed what role the author would be fulfilling or something</p>
<p>The royal wrists were haughty command.</p>
<p>Both punctuation authors agree that writing isn’t static</p>
<p>Yep I put not static as well. Poor thinking was another answer.</p>
<p>Hey guys,
For the roman numeral one, why would the difference between the terms be 2^n n=positive? My math textbooks have always said that difference is subtraction. So the difference between 2 and 3 would be -1? And since the terms were like 3, 7, 16 or something like that, couldn’t I say that the difference between 7 and 16 is equal to a negative number? Which would make the II statement false because you can only get positive numbers with 2^n n= a positive number.</p>
<p>Author 2 would think errors in a letter in punctuation were due to poor thinking</p>
<p>@Jumbotron </p>
<p>The sequence was 3, 5, 9, 17</p>
<p>Choice 2 was this “The difference between 2 consecutive terms is 2^n where n is positive integer.”</p>
<p>The difference between 5 and 3 is 2 which is 2^1
The difference between 9 and 5 is 4 which is 2^2
The difference between 17 and 9 is 8 which is 2^3</p>
<p>for the first grid in, could 5 be a possible value of n?</p>