<p>ok i just fleshed out my argument to make it sound more logical. Here was my thinking process… wordplay= puns. no puns, no wordplay. check, done.</p>
<p>@Dynasty21 Had the same problem for the idiom for Chance of/for survival… I think I ended up picking no error (or a different error) because I thought of chance of rain and was like “screw this moving on”</p>
<p>She complimented too much that it was negligible
All the answer choices for that one other than the answer were synonyms like auspicious </p>
<p>Damn I’m now expecting like 680 </p>
<p>it should have been “chance of survival” because I checked an “a” in front of the underlines part</p>
<p>@TheCHAMPION because it said that she inveterately gave praise. </p>
<p>yeah i put no error for that chance of one too i changed that tho</p>
<p>pretty confident on 800 math. Don’t think I missed any on writing yet, I know I missed one on reading (puerile). Hopefully no more, but who knows 
</p>
<p>have been written by or are written by? for the wikipedia question</p>
<p>@TheCHAMPION wait really? I thought it was an idiomatic error: “chance for survival”. It would really make my day if that underlined option was wrong. </p>
<p>guys if you miss 1 grid in what would you get</p>
<p>Anyone else have input for the Writing question with the phrase “chance of survival” underlined?</p>
<p>@botherme Now u have me me thinking. But like i dont think wordplay meant pun only i feel like it was a broad answer idk. We shall see lol</p>
<p>dont those like not count?</p>
<p>fa;skdfk noo you’re right. I read it as chance of survival</p>
<p>Yea pensive! The Knights ir something like that lol</p>
<p>wait so “of survival” was underlined? and “chance” was not?</p>
<p>@TheCHAMPION is written by because the subject was content. </p>
<p>*for</p>
<p>@TheCHAMPION I’m pretty sure I put are written by.</p>