<p>It just seemed that author 2 viewed punctuation as a necessity with significant influence on writing and less of an emotional attitude towards punctuation, just IMO.</p>
<p>like honestly how do you even know for writing</p>
<p>That’s not what nostalgia means! Nostalgia is a longing for the past, ie remembering your childhood, not wanting rules of grammar to remain!</p>
<p>No the second passage guy was talking about how with punctuation everything would be so much clearer and stuff. Obviously he values it more.</p>
<p>@FuriousApplicant I’m pretty sure I got the I, II, III one wrong in math, and the “articles are written/have been written” one for writing … so I’m basically screwed. let’s say 770 in math (if the curve is generous), 770 writing, and ? reading. :(</p>
<p>nostalgic could fit under that description so are you guys seniors or juniors</p>
<p>So for writing for the improving the paragraph did you guys put “incidentally” or some other phrase that started with “more” for a transition for the beginning of a sentence.</p>
<p>ok i admit he might have been slightly nostalgic. But the overall tone and attitude was that of esteem.</p>
<p>no i put incidentally</p>
<p>thats right fo sho</p>
<p>did you put delete the sentence for the first one</p>
<p>Do you guy remember more questions</p>
<p>@TheCHAMPION what articles are written/have been written? Do you remember the question?</p>
<p>nah… it was “what’s more”</p>
<p>you know the one about the guys last time and how it started off with “to make his last name” on writing</p>
<p>did you put no error for that it was like his dad wanted to him to have this ceartin last name</p>
<p>I remember getting a delete the sentence @indianboy797983, don’t remember what the question/ sentence was though… anyone else get a delete the sentence?</p>
<p>I have taken over 20 past SAT exams ranging from 2008-2014. The Critical Reading passage about voting patterns that had a graph had questions with a format I have never seen before. That one was long, confusing, and difficult. I know i did very poor on that section. I swear if that is not the experimental section, I will cry. </p>
<p>he was trying to make a point and listing out many examples. He then went on to list the final example, so “incidentally” would not have been an appropriate example. “what’s more” was the only one that could apply</p>
<p>@Dynasty21 “Wikipedia is different in that many of its articles (are written) or (have been written) by users.”</p>