<p>its whats more</p>
<p>Score me? M:0 CR:4 WR:2</p>
<p>I agree, it should be what’s more. Incidentally doesn’t fit the tone.</p>
<p>@CornelianGuy earlier for me people were saying what’s more…incidentally implies by chance and connects the sentence less deliberately–it doesn’t matter how many people chose it, it’s still wrong </p>
<p>and average is 4.6</p>
<p>Yea, the majority is wrong then if they said the answer was incidentally.</p>
<p>@daniiiiis Yes, p was answer letter A (I can literally picture the question in my head).</p>
<p>damn thats 3x in writing</p>
<p>this is ridiculous, I don’t want to retake.</p>
<p>So what are you saying the answer is</p>
<p>@redrabbit23 ahh thank you you are my lifesaver! now I have a chance at M -0</p>
<p>what’s the question for what’s more and incidentally?</p>
<p>yea i looked up the idioms, “whats more” is obviously correct</p>
<p>for the math roman numerals question, i think it was only 2 and 3, because one stated that all of the numbers were odd, which wasn’t true if you found the next one in the sequence (17x17=289-1=288)</p>
<p>@imsoworried the numbers aren’t squaring, they are multiplying by 2 minus one. all multiples of 2 are even, so all multiples of 2 minus 1 must be odd</p>
<p>Double, don’t square…</p>
<p>P and 4.6 were the answers to the 2 average questions</p>
<p>halcyon
segregation Q-(something)-champion
puerile
pensive
physics question- (something)-empirical
negligible</p>
<p>OOOOH i get it now!!! ty 
</p>
<p>definitely thought it was squaring LOL </p>