<p>hey guys I’m sure you guys have talked about it but what did you think we’re the cr experimental sections? I had 4 and I had the passages
dinosaurs
‘Yo’
Greek
Kanzi
i might’ve mixed something up but any ideas?</p>
<p>^ I had all of those and didn’t have an experimental section. Try to remember the rest of the passages you had.</p>
<p>Did anyone else find the Kanzi passage difficult?</p>
<p>Did anyone have the short passage of that disappearing girl or something? And creative writing?</p>
<p>Can someone put up a compilation of all questions we can recall? For those controversial ones we can have —/—</p>
<p>what was the answer to that question where it was like what does “secret heart” mean?</p>
<p>All I’ve got so far:(thanks to Galinda and myself)</p>
<p>autonomous
teasing
mired = stuck
phlegmatic
mollifying
urbane and erudite
passage 1 - response, passage 2 - communication (ape passage)
scientific implications
to validate the statement
insufficiently skeptical
superfluous
…and disproportionate
acknowledge that a position seems unreasonable
scant and undistinguished
readily willing to challenge perceived notions (???)
puzzling phenomenon
ideologue
scholarly enthusiasm
clearly wrong, has not been proven wrong yet…???
stories change with social changes
memories he is willing to share
accessible
alternative explanation
present tense used for contrast
inhibit/skew
indefatigable
marketing campaign increased sales
teacher’s eccentric questions
unique that he responds to the teacher
undisclosed self
appreciate / ambivalent
go in there (believes the ape can’t understand “in”)
behavioral evidence is used by both authors
letter between Newton and Leibenitz
Peer editing/Self reflection
Writing skills predate writing classes
the significance of use of language by a particular ape</p>
<p>All I’ve got so far:(thanks to Galinda and myself)</p>
<p>autonomous
teasing
mired = stuck
phlegmatic
mollifying
urbane and erudite
passage 1 - response, passage 2 - communication (ape passage)
scientific implications
to validate the statement
insufficiently skeptical
superfluous
…and disproportionate
acknowledge that a position seems unreasonable
scant and undistinguished
readily willing to challenge perceived notions (???)
puzzling phenomenon
ideologue
scholarly enthusiasm
clearly wrong, has not been proven wrong yet…???
stories change with social changes
memories he is willing to share
accessible
alternative explanation
present tense used for contrast
inhibit/skew
indefatigable
marketing campaign increased sales
teacher’s eccentric questions
unique that he responds to the teacher
undisclosed self
appreciate / ambivalent
go in there (believes the ape can’t understand “in”)
behavioral evidence is used by both authors
letter between Newton and Leibenitz
Peer editing/Self reflection
Writing skills predate writing classes
the significance of use of language by a particular ape</p>
<p>^ For what question was “ideologue” the correct response?</p>
<p>“Peer Editing” is incorrect. It explicitly said that it was “useful but not necessary”</p>
<p>^ I disagree with both</p>
<p>I don’t understand how it’s not
“The most talented writers probably wouldn’t go”</p>
<p>That was the question on what the authors would agree on? Doesn’t the one on top make sense more?</p>
<p>none-it was polymath</p>
<p>For the vague recollections of the past why couldn’t it be information he was going to share with his daughter?
and for the validate a statement why couldn’t it be to document a process well i guess document a process is stretching it a bit but i was between those two :c</p>
<p>@pashypashy I don’t think it was to validate a statement or to document a process. I put down that it was to approximate. The definition of approximate is to: estimate or calculate (a quantity) fairly accurately. The quantity in discussion was 148, the thing being measured was the number of events said to be linked to the multiples theory.</p>
<p>Approximate, to me, speaks of numerical evidence – things we can count, like 148 events. When we approximate, we are adding more information to make an assertion stronger. When we validate something, well I don’t think it’s about figures so much as facts. The act of validation is the greater category, and to approximate is a subset of that reserved for numbers that help support an argument.</p>
<p>You said you put down “document a process”: 1. the sentence was describing the endpoint of the research project, what the researchers conclusion was about the multiples theory, so I don’t think it was so much a “process” as the follow-up period to the “process”. 2. to document something suggests that the tidbit about “148 cases” provides evidence in the form of audio, video or print.</p>
<p>what question’s answer was “disproportionate”
and “readily willing to challenge perceived notions”
and “ideologue” (i thought this thread said that that was wrong…)
“alternative explanation”
“Peer editing/Self reflection”
and what were alternative choices to “the significance of use of language by a particular ape”</p>
<p>“disproportionate” is the SC about a writer’s reputation? </p>
<p>I remember putting down “alternative explanation.” Other ones - not so sure.</p>
<p>Also, does anyone remember the Persia reading (very short with two questions)? What does the parenthetical sentence do?</p>
<p>For the yo one, it was definitely that he complied to the preposterous requests. He’s never talking about uniqueness and the secret heart doesn’t have with him being unique, it has with him being undisclosed. And it was information he was going to share with his daughter and he’s not really showing a process so it wasn’t that.</p>
<p>@a1rplanes, why wouldn’t it be to validate a statement? The author was using an actual statistic to prove his or her point that a lot of scientific innovations occur around the same time with a verifiable statistic to show he or she was right in making that statement.</p>
<p>He’s not approximating because he never said approximately or “about” he gave an exact value</p>
<p>@skrap322 - I put readily willing to challenge perceived notions, polymath instead of idealoguge. </p>
<p>@a1r - I also put to approximate something</p>
<p>I agree with StudiousMaximus about the question about dinosaurs on the physics discovery. From the passage, it had the most direct connection because scientific innovation would drive interest into children to buy yo-yos since that would considered “cool” at the time.</p>