<p>Its 60. It CANT be 75 because it was sitting on a cube and therefore one of the angles was a right angle (90 degrees) therefore there is only two triangles like that.</p>
<p>90+60+30
90+45+45</p>
<p>It sure wasnt the 90+45+45 so it had to be 90+60+30</p>
<p>it was 60 because you know that the square inside the cube had the same side legnths as the cube. then, you know that one part of the triangle we're looking at is half the legnth as the hypotenues(sp). from here you should just recognize that it's a 30-60-90 and the(x, 2x). once you see that you see that the x is between a 90 a 60 degree angle</p>
<p>30-60-90 and 45-45-90 arent the only kinds of right triangles, lol. it couldnt possibly be 60..if it was 60 the line coming across the front face of the cube would have to extend to the vertex in order for the longer leg to be double the shorter. it wasnt, so it cant be 60.</p>
<p>irishblues - No, it was 6000. I put in 3000 at first but then noticed my mistake. When I setup my equation I got 3000 as an answer but that was 1/2(X) so they were asking for the capacity, which is X = 6000. I hope :)</p>
<p>Can anyone remember the answer to the combination one where there are 5 job spots availible with 8 applicants, and you find the # of combinations with both people.</p>