<p>I tried to post this same message myself but couldn’t get the link correct.</p>
<p>Although I am an Iowa Hawkeye (my boy, however is currently in the COE at Michigan, boo) I never really considered the Wolverines as a nationwide gang – the reason for the school’s band on the student’s UMich t-shirt.</p>
<p>If they want to ban college wear, they should ban ALL college wear, rather than carve out an exclusion for the state schools. Maybe there is a compelling reason (not the the wolverines are a gang, but that local gangs “borrow” their colors), but it seems silly to ban it in the younger grades. If you’re going to impose a ban at the HS level, what’s to stop the gangs from adopting the local school colors? It sounds like they carved out an exception because otherwise the policy would be too unpopular - well, too bad. Either the gang problem is bad enough to enact a ban, or it isn’t! Imagine the HS Senior who is accepted to UMich, and can’t wear their t-shirt, while his classmates who choose to stay in-state can, or the student whose older sibling attends Harvard or Princeton (or wherever else).</p>
<p>Truthfully, I don’t mind that they are enforcing this, even on a kindergarten student. If the dress code is the same and enforced all through school it shows consistency. Why would it be okay for a 6th grader to wear something but a 7th grader can’t? Better to set the standards and enforce them everywhere. It isn’t as if the tyke was taken out of class.</p>
<p>It’s a T-shirt… Only a T-shirt. There isn’t justification for doing something this pathetic. Let the kid wear his shirt.</p>
<p>one of MSN headline today
[Michigan</a> responds to OKC boy’s banned gear](<a href=“http://www.foxsportssouthwest.com/08/22/12/Michigan-responds-to-OKC-boys-banned-gea/msn_landing.html?blockID=779531&feedID=3601]Michigan”>http://www.foxsportssouthwest.com/08/22/12/Michigan-responds-to-OKC-boys-banned-gea/msn_landing.html?blockID=779531&feedID=3601)</p>
<p>For a public school system to ban Michigan and other out-of state university apparel, yet allow UOklahoma and OSU gear is ridiculous–and an endorsement of of academic mediocrity.</p>
<p>admgod007, that’s an awesome response from the Michigan athletic department!</p>
<p>What a bizarre rule… have out-of-state school emblems really been adopted by gangs? If I show up in an orange Tennessee Vol shirt, who am I secretly endorsing?</p>
<p>No doubt a Fighting Irish shirt might encourage bullying. Or, be an offensive stereotype for students of Irish descent. Sheesh…</p>
<p>Reminds me of my favorite joke:</p>
<p>What happened when the Texas A&M Aggie moved to Oklahoma?</p>
<p>The IQ of both states went up.</p>
<p>One of my favorites, too! Maine Longhorn, how about this one: Why doesn’t Texas fall into the ocean?<br>
Because Oklahoma sucks!
As to the earlier posters, I agree, either ban all sports team t-shirts or none, no in-state favoritism. My California recently graduated high school S was born in Texas and UT shirts were the majority of his wardrobe until he started college. In fact, he still wears them a lot even though he has started at a UC.</p>
<p>What is it with the University of Michigan and states that start with “O”? Wonder what Oregon is going to do to upset them.</p>
<p>Its not that bad, I’ve been in the OKCPC system for 4 years now. Oklahoma is big about its pride.</p>
<p>This wouldn’t happen in Ohio. In our local district you typically see a few students K - 12 wear U of M shirts and when OSU plays Michigan, there are always some Michigan shirts along with OSU. Many Ohioans graduate from that school up north and I’m one of them.</p>
<p>Could someone let me know where Oklohoma is?</p>
<p>It is just south of Cansus. :-)</p>
<p>totally unreasonable…! Poor kid</p>