On the Duke decisions check place...

<p>Disclaimer: Obviously, I’m reading too much into this and this is going to be a little over the top. I analyzed this data because I was curious for myself, and of course because I’m a closet math nerd and do this kind of stuff all the time. I collected people’s data that I could find who posted their times and who have previously posted an SAT score on CC, and converted ACT scores into SAT. This data by no means comes from a simple random sample, and there is obviously more to college admissions than SAT scores. Feel free to judge whether these results are statistically significant.</p>

<p>1:16- mean SAT=2298, n=17
tristan101, ocgirl92, VJK, augustagurrl, oceanangel, 314159, ryanh126, cr_freak, Idosyncra3y, plumazul, aznjunior, GregC123, FightTheTide11, plumdum229, Torcher, fresca, USNAgolden2014</p>

<p>5:35- mean SAT=2104, n=13
jacko5x, miller10, soap0727, ready4college123, jenx1234, ihope92, sarah!, rteter, appliedto10, spiritualwitch, An0nmity, pozzol, kzhi2u</p>

<p>wow π you have too much time on your hands</p>

<p>i’m adding myself to the list i got a 2290 (math- 770, cr- 780, wr- 740) and im getting 1:16. </p>

<p>1:16- mean SAT=2297.5, n=18
tristan101, ocgirl92, VJK, augustagurrl, oceanangel, 314159, ryanh126, cr<em>freak, Idosyncra3y, plumazul, aznjunior, GregC123, FightTheTide11, plumdum229, Torcher, fresca, USNAgolden2014, cr</em>freak</p>

<p>5:35- mean SAT=2104, n=13
jacko5x, miller10, soap0727, ready4college123, jenx1234, ihope92, sarah!, rteter, appliedto10, spiritualwitch, An0nmity, pozzol, kzhi2u</p>

<p>I have a 2220…mine says 5:35.</p>

<p>2390, 1:16</p>

<p>I highly doubt duke would make acceptance/rejection so obvious though.</p>

<p>Wow PI, I am in awe of you.</p>

<p>Lol if the 1:19 thing holds true then all 5 people who applied from my school got in…which doesn’t make sense.</p>

<p>new averages:
1:16- 2303
5:35- 2113
1-sided hypothesis test (for those in AP stat) gives a p=1.013*10^-4</p>

<p>Torcher, by “in awe” do you mean that it was crazy/a waste of time for me to do this? I agree :)</p>

<p>Using a 2-sample T-Test for the difference of the means of two independent populations, assuming a standard deviation of 200 for each population (which in reality is probably much smaller):</p>

<p>t= 2.658
p=.0066</p>

<p>Translation into English: It is ridiculously unlikely that the difference in SAT scores for the two times happened purely by chance.</p>

<p>1:16
2140
10 char</p>

<p>Adding golfer’s and some others’ numbers, the sample standard deviations from our data (139 for 1:16 and 85 for 5:35) gives:
t=4.308
p=1.684*10^-4</p>

<p>By the way, I used a one-sided test, which tests whether the 1:16’s SAT are higher, not just unequal to, that of the 5:35 SAT’s. A two-sided test to just test whether an inequality exists would be double the p-value above.</p>

<p>I agree with plumazul’s conclusion. I guess we’ll find out what this means on Monday!</p>

<p>Lol you guys just reminded me that I have a ton of statistics hw to do tonight…</p>

<p>2320</p>

<p>1:16</p>

<p>1:16
SAT: 2140
And I got a likely. So if there is actually a rejected and accepted time difference, than congratulations to those with 1:16. We’ll find out on Monday (:</p>

<p>did all the likely letter applicants get 1:16?</p>

<p>horse- congrats on your likely! :D</p>

<p>

now THAT is a good question
you could pm them :wink:
<a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/duke-university/888923-likely-letter.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/duke-university/888923-likely-letter.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>this is the most ridiculous discussion ever. decided.</p>

<p>When posting decisions on Monday, make sure you post your time as well. </p>

<p>If there’s any correlation, we will find it!</p>

<p>After some stalking/investigation, I have found that plumazul (1:16) also got a likely letter!</p>

<p>1:16 ftw! (maybe)</p>