<p>I agree with you, BrownParent, on your point about taking Malcolm Gladwell’s conclusions with a grain of salt. I currently work with undergrads at my competitive graduate university, and students often rise to the challenge. If you are in a competitive atmosphere it changes the way you think - especially in the particularly malleable 18-25 years. For example, I don’t think that many 17-year-olds dream of being financiers, but I think the atmosphere and expectations of the Columbia/Barnard community make many students want to work these kinds of jobs. I was actually talking about this to an undergrad the other day, and she says being around the kinds of peers whose families could afford vacation homes and trips to Europe - even if you didn’t have that yourself growing up - makes you want those things. Moreover, if what your peers value is fancy hedge fund jobs and med school acceptances, you’re going to try to get those things to stay in step with people you consider your peer group.</p>
<p>And there’s absolutely nothing wrong with that - that’s the way peer groups are supposed to function. The upside to that is that here, a B- is like OMG NOOOOO. It encourages you to do really well because your peers value As. (Now, of course that contributes to stress! There are trade-offs.) The community at Spelman, my alma mater, was not so much focused on straight As, and I admit that because that wasn’t valued there I didn’t work as hard as I could have to maintain, let’s say, a 3.8 GPA (which is fine - that’s what I wanted from college). It was, however, focused on giving back and doing service. So most of us worked in at least one - and frequently 2 or 3 - service projects while at Spelman as extracurriculars, as well as tried to find careers we felt would give back and help others. Even if you worked at a bank or financial services firm, you tried to find one that gave to charity and appreciated community and pro bono work. That was the culture; it’s what you felt like your peers, and your alma mater, expected you to do. It pervades you, even when you don’t expect it to.</p>
<p>So let me temper my original post - I’m in total agreement that you have to select your college carefully to have a peer group that challenges you and encourages you to meet your potential. My only point is that SAT scores don’t tell the whole story, and a lot of people here have a much narrower view of the kinds of colleges/universities that can challenge you in that way. You don’t have to go to a college at which you fall in the middle 50% of SAT scores in order to be challenged and rise to your potential. At the same time, though, you don’t want to be in a demotivating place where you won’t be challenged. For example, a student used to writing 10-15 page tightly-written literary papers for English class doesn’t want to go somewhere where senior seminars only require 3-5 page papers, much less freshman comp. Someone who wants to become a master debater and public speaker doesn’t want to go to a college that never requires class presentations.</p>
<p>I think the best way to gauge that is to visit when school is in session and sit in on a sample class. I did this at Spelman before hand and I LOVED the class discussion, and nearly all of my classes were actually like that. I think you have to go on a normal day, though, because professors (like everyone else) are on their best behavior on the special visit days and sometimes plan something different.</p>