<p>ariesathena~
If I were to apply your standards for "valued" poster, Carolyn would be one of top people on my list for qualifiers. I do not know which post you are referring to, but I am familiar enough with Carolyn's contributions to know that she would never have posted something that would deserve "crucifixion" by anyone.</p>
<p>That said, I have witnessed NUMEROUS incidents in which other either self-proclaimed or other-proclaimed "valuable posters" have engaged in egregiously nasty and arrogant behavior that is then excused by the community for the simple reason that the poster is deemed "valued". I took 1sokkermom's post to be referring to this type of thing, and in that regard, I am in full agreement with her. </p>
<p>If anything, the "valued" posters should be expected to adhere to a higher standard of decorum, precisely because of their "valued" status. I personally believe that the standard should be universal--for EVERYONE. But if there is to be a "double standard", I would expect the "valued" posters to adhere to the HIGHER one. ~berurah</p>