<p>"The University of Pennsylvania, one of the fastest rising research universities in the U.S. News rankings, is one institution that seems to have cracked the code. In 1994, Penn ranked 50th in the faculty-resources category. By 2002 it ranked first in that category, a position it has held ever since. Partly as a result, Penn’s overall rank rose from 16th in 1994 to as high as fourth, most recently in 2006. This year it ranks seventh.</p>
<p>The university’s strategy “includes the recruitment and retention of an ever-more-eminent faculty, reduced class size, increased financial aid, greater opportunities for undergraduates to engage in research, and optimizing opportunities for interdisciplinary work,” says a spokesman, Ron Ozio. “We will continue to pursue that strategy regardless of where we stand in any external rankings.”</p>
<p>A former Penn official said the institution was constantly evaluating its programs and how they were doing in the rankings.</p>
<p>“The effect of different policies on the rankings was constantly being taken into account,” says Colin S. Diver, dean of the law school at Penn from 1989 to 1999, and now president of Reed College. “My sense was, trustees who really cared about the rankings were particularly influential.”"</p>
<p>-Penn jumped 49 places in faculty resources in 8 years? Hrm, sounds suspicious. <a href=“http://chronicle.com/free/v53/i38/38a01101.htm[/url]”>http://chronicle.com/free/v53/i38/38a01101.htm</a></p>
<p>"4. University of Pennsylvania </p>
<p>And now we’re on the other side of the looking glass. Penn is a very good research university, to be sure, one of the top 15 or so in the nation, on a par, more or less, with UCLA, Wisconsin, Texas, Cornell, etc. But how did it get ranked 4th for undergraduate education? It certainly has a better student-faculty ratio than state research universities like Wisconsin and Texas, but that’s not why it’s ranked 4th. It’s ranked 4th because they cook the numbers, plain and simple (as a former Penn Dean said to me a few years back, "I’d hate to be around if they ever audited the books"). That started with former Penn President Judith Rodin; whether Amy Gutmann will continue that “tradition” remains to be seen. **For a variety of reasons having to do with the ranking criteria, the undergraduate rankings are even more subject to manipulation through creative accounting and outright fraud than the law school rankings. **</p>
<p><a href="http://leiterreports.typepad.com/blog/2004/08/the_latest_us_n.html">http://leiterreports.typepad.com/blog/2004/08/the_latest_us_n.html</a>"</p>