<p>I'm applying to PennDesign for grad school and want to apply for the Dean's Diversity Scholarship. I need to submit a 500 word response to this prompt:</p>
<p>PennDesign seeks to bring students to our school whose backgrounds and experiences offer varying perspectives on living and learning in a multicultural world. In order to accomplish this, we offer special Dean's Diversity Scholarships to students whose backgrounds and experiences demonstrate the ability to contribute to increasing socioeconomic and multicultural diversity awareness at the School of Design.</p>
<p>How can I respond to this, given that I am a white, middle-class female from the suburbs and the prompt explicitly states "socioeconomic and multicultural diversity"??</p>
<p>I really hate this question, honestly. I am 75% european "mutt" (eastern, central, and northern) and 25% ojibwa native american. I did not grow up with a "culture" to reference because my family does not necessarily identify with any of these ancestral backgrounds (who would when you're 7% this and 2% that??). I don't believe that you need an ethnic culture to be a well-rounded member of society and contribute to the educational environment. To say that we need X% minority A and X% minority B is to say that a student body's collective intellectual merit means nothing--that it is solely based on what kind of skin-colored "rainbow" we can produce by enforcing these percentages. </p>
<p>While I strongly value diversity on the level of varying life experiences, intellectual inquiries are simply more interesting when we come from different backgrounds, I strongly disagree with UPenn's set-up here. WHO THE F*** CARES what color we are or how much money our families grew up with? A person's ideas and approach are what matter, and as long as mine are different than the other 99%, shouldn't I be considered an individual instead of just another piece in the "middle-class white girl" bracket? This question, to me, is just another example of how society will be better off when our generation is in the seat of current admissions committees. </p>
<p>How can I respond to this prompt without being disrespectful, given that I disagree entirely with the premise here?</p>