<p>I’m sorry, I may be in the minority here, but I don’t think the auditions were “rigged” at CMU or elsewhere (and no, my D did not get in). So if the head of a MT department shouldn’t give master classes for a coach, does that mean they can’t give a master class elsewhere? Because they do. All the time. My D did a master class with Brent Wagner of UMich at Goodpseed Opera House in CT. It was very informative, and ANYONE could have applied. And, in fact, one of the people at that master class got into UMich (and CMU). He got in b/c he was incredibly talented, not b/c he went to the master class. </p>
<p>Master classes help the students too…some kids go to a master class and decide they didn’t like the way a school or a professor teaches, and then they decide not to apply to that school. Or, conversely, they can fall in love with a program director and decide to apply to the school because of their experience in the class. Do some professors/ program directors see a student in a master class and think, “I really want that kid in my program?” Undoubtedly. But what’s wrong with that??? They were going to see that child at auditions and think the same thing. </p>
<p>There is absolutely no way that these schools are going to sacrifice a spot in their coveted, highly competitive program to make a coach happy. These schools take just a handful of kids…why would they take someone they don’t want? Are you implying that the schools are being paid to take certain kids? That is a very serious accusation, and one I cannot believe is true. Nor would it be financially viable. These professors and program directors can and do master classes all over, for coaches, for theaters, for camps…yes, they get paid to do it. But it cannot possibly be enough money to warrant taking a student they don’t want into their tiny college program.</p>
<p>CMU took the kids that they thought were the best for their program, undoubtedly without ANY regard to who was coached or wasn’t coached, or who they were coached by. The bottom line is that kids can get in to top programs without coaches. Kids with coaches also get into top programs. It’s the talent…it all comes down to the talent. If your child is talented, and the right fit for a particular school, they have a good chance at getting into that school. Period. </p>
<p>Gigrighta, you say that most of the kids at this stage have talent. Most - but not all - do. But it is not the same level of talent. There are clearly some stand out kids. Look at the acceptance thread. Some kids are getting in virtually everywhere. They are getting in b/c they are more talented. Sorry, but it’s true. There are kids who are being coached getting in nowhere. Coaching can help kids choose the right audition material, refine their college list, perfect their monologues, etc. But a less talented kid is not going to get into a school because of their coach. Ever. Money cannot buy talent.</p>