Please score my essay out of 12! And feedback :D

<p>Score my SAT essay please :D</p>

<p>Words alone cannot describe the extent to which taking more responsibility to solve problems that effect our community is an indispensable factor of people's lives that contribute the development of the world. One should not fall prey to the fallacious misconception that people should be acted upon by events in society rather than making a contribution. Hence, it can be said with utmost confidence that responsibility is crucial to reach unparalleled heights of globa, human and society success - which is illustrated through history and literature.</p>

<p>We need look no further than "Death of a Salesman" in which Arthur Miller meticulously constructs an architypal failure, Willy Loman: he lives in a dilapidated home, his love for his wife is fading away, and his relationship between his two children is deteriorating. Despite being plagued by a myriad of adversities, Willy Loman decided that he will no longer allow his old age and traditional method of business hinder him from being the provider of the family. In act II, Willy approaches Howard, his long time adversary (who is more successful than Willy), for a job because Willy believed it was time for him to lay down his heavy ego and put food on the table. In the end, Willy eventually out-performs everyone in Howard's law firm and is offered a better job at Saint Hilton's. This example is significant because it marks the blue prints of Willy's life in which he decides to take responsible action to turn his adversities into opportunities. He solved a problem affecting his family; it shows that if everyone takes small steps, he or she can solve problems affecting larger communities, our global community.</p>

<p>Take as another example the so-called "remarkable" career of Dmitri Tobalski whose "groundbreaking" discovery of the particle duality of electrons. Like e trite maxim: all you need in this life is ignorance and confidence; success is sure, Tobalski's success is a misnomer because his so-called discovery was not his own. Tobalski was a reserved individual and did not like to share his innovations with other scientists. He was often consumed in his own world; he like to carry out off, useless research. As a scientists/researcher at the University of Zenit Petersburg, Tobalski was irresponsible as he conducted research out of personal interest ,using funds from the government, rather than for the development of the Soviet Russia. At the end of his career, he amassed nothing and was charged with embezzlement but was oddly named the brainchild of particle duality for reasons we have yet to discover. This example accentuates that if people take action driven by personal needs rather than for the betterment of our community, their lives will be meaningless.</p>

<p>An indisputable reality of life is that responsiblity to improve our community is, indeed, essential. In final analysis, responsible action, motivated to improve our society, is the spark that will ignite the engines of modern society.</p>

<p>The reason why my second paragraph sounds odd and doesn't fit the question is because this is my universal template. I memorize most of it and change the story so that it 'answers' the question. Should I change the subject of paragraph 2? I think it would be better to make it general like the first example. Any ideas?</p>

<ol>
<li> intro is messed up especially the first sentence which leaves a really bad impression on the reader. 7-10 is your best bet</li>
</ol>

<p>Trying to hard to sound smart, which leaves you (for example) with things like this: “fallacious misconception” which more or less says the same thing twice.</p>

<p>hahahahahahaha aigoooooo</p>

<p>Okay, my Korean nuisance.</p>

<p>If you’re going to use the template, simplify it and make a proper counterargument. </p>

<p>“One should not fall prey to the fallacious misconception that people should be acted upon by events in society rather than making a contribution.”</p>

<p>PEOPLE SHOULD NOT BE ACTED UPON BY EVENTS?? </p>

<p>Words alone cannot describe the extent to which people often neglect social issues or problems that do not directly affect them. One must not, however, fall prey to the misconception that such a negligent attitude is thereby acceptable or excusable. All people do indeed bear a civic responsibility to actively address problems that affect their communities in order to preserve their own welfare and promote social progress. Several social and historical examples will support this claim.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>You need to answer the question. Of course you need to replace your second paragraph.</p>

<p>I’m not sure you shouldn’t replace the first one either. Willy Loman is a lot of things, but responsible isn’t one of them.</p>

<p>Okay, so what do I have to work on?</p>

<p>Okay wait. What do you mean counter argument? Can you give an example please?</p>

<p>Its good. Strong vocab and all. Fix wording in Paragraph one and it will be a 10 or 11</p>

<p>(7/12). Don’t be discourage by this in any way.</p>

<p>By all means necessary avoid templates when it comes to writing. Writing is about creativity. Certainly structure and organization is important, but you color your essays to your true audience.</p>

<p>FYI, I see a writer with a gift of color in writing, but let your creativity shine, and do not let a template by some other writer detect your own style. Who knows your work might be a standard for the author of the template you are trying to imitate.</p>