<p>How do the tests in Princeton Review compare to the actual CB tests for SAT II Biology? I'm aiming for an 800 and was hoping I wouldn't have to do much studying for the test, so I was a bit disappointed with my 720 :(</p>
<p>I think PR is pretty much close to the real test. Maybe you should check which particular areas you had trouble with and review them again in the book.</p>
<p>PR is pretty good. The thing about Bio is that the curve's harsh compared to the other sciences, so you have to be near perfect. Consider doing Barrons as well (The tests) as well as Spark, just for reassurance. </p>
<p>And obviously do the blue book.</p>
<p>Blue book? Isnt this for the subject tests?</p>
<p>There's a blue book for subject tests too. And I did go back to see what I got wrong and luckily most of the questions are just things I haven't learned in AP Bio yet so hopefully I'll understand them in about a month.</p>
<p>Hey,
I took it when I was a frosh w/ the PR book. I almost decided not to take it the day before b/c I got a 670 on the practice test. I think those tests are much harder though- I got a 770 on the test w/ only freshman yr. Bio.</p>