<p>I've been going through the PR review book and it is quite good. But I sometimes get worried that although the material is concise and understandable, the examples and problems may be too easy compared to the ones on the real exam. How does PR's questions compare to the ones on the actual AP test. BTW this is Physics B. Any other book suggestions?</p>
<p>Bump!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>I have the same question but for the AP Chem exam. The consensus though is that PR is fairly accurate.</p>
<p>It was smack on target for APUSH. I remember last year thinking that the PR tests were too easy, since I struggled in class. And than come AP test day, the test itself was just as easy.</p>
<p>interms of SAT, the PR stuff in general i've heard is too hard & they dont curve, so you feel really comfortable with the actual test. im not sure if the same goes for AP tests though.</p>
<p>wat about Barron's? are their querstions pretty accurate?</p>
<p>No Barron's questions are generally harder than the real thing. So PR's AP Physics questions are just right?</p>
<p>so if u do barron's, you should be even more better prepared, am i correct?</p>
<p>not necessarily...they give too much information, and the excess information can cause you to lose focus and actually score worse.</p>
<p>so what about PR's questions? Accurate or not? Easier or harder than real test?</p>
<p>I'm not positive about the physics AP, but with every PR book I've used (many) PR has been extremely accurate, so I would assume that it would be very accurate with physics as well</p>
<p>PR is a great testmaker and guide. The only problem I ever had was with their AP government book, the projections put me at a 4 and I ended up with a 3, I do believe I was the middle of the line student which operates within their margin of error.</p>