<p>I took one of the two practice exams from the official GMAT website. It says that it is not an accurate predictor of your actual score which sounds like just a disclaimer. However, I scored much better than I thought I would and I'm wondering how accurate it is.</p>
<p>For reference, I scored a 740: 49 in Quantitative and 41 in Verbal. What can I expect on the real one? Before I took the test, I would have been content with a 650, and now my expectations are pretty high.</p>
<p>I took two practice tests the two days before my GMAT. I got the exact same score on both and on test day I again received that same score on my actual GMAT exam. </p>
<p>In my limited experience I’d say the practice tests were very consistent and accurate.</p>
<p>The GPREP software is fairly accurate.</p>
<p>As Sparty12 I got a high mark before starting to study in the 1st test (Will do the 2nd a couple of days before the exam). I have been told that it is easier than the real test to encourage people to sign up. Also I got 50 in the quantitative with 9 mistakes which I find quite strange… </p>
<p>Anyone else has info on this topic? More real-life example of GMATprep tests mark and real exam marks? </p>
<p>Much appreciated.</p>
<p>I took the GMATprep practice and got the same score as my real test - 700</p>
<p>Eldo, you got a 50 despite getting 9 wrong because the 9 that you got wrong were questions that were at a very high level. Remember the GMAT is a computer adaptive test</p>
<p>I finally took the exam a couple of weeks ago and I got the same mark in the real test than in my 2nd GMATPrep test two days before the test (770) so now I have changed my mind and I believe that good test-takers that can handle the extra pressure of the real test will perform in the real test as good as in fresh GMATPrep tests.</p>