<p>Now, I know that PR isn't the most accurate, but I've heard good things about this book. I've done all of the BB and nearly half of 10RS. The only tests I have left are 5 QAS and I plan on using those for progress/diagnosis. I really need to get more practice for my math, as I usually score high 600 to low 700 on it, but I want to solidify my confidence in getting that up to a mid 700 and above.</p>
<p>How are the PR11 tests for math? Accurate? Or very inaccurate?</p>
<p>I haven't taken the actual SAT yet, but I've worked through 4 of the PR11 2006 tests. I'd say the math section seems to be alright. It's noticeably easier than the BB math problems, I'd say. Even though I've only taken the first BB test so far.</p>
<p>i consistently score 740-760 on QAS and BlueBook math, around 750-770 in writing and 660-700 in reading...</p>
<p>however, on PR11 i only score around 700 in math, 700 in writing and about 630-650 in reading.</p>
<p>PR IS MUCH HARDER</p>
<p>PR is harder.</p>
<p>yea but i think the PR tests in cracking are easier</p>
<p>yes true. PR 11 are harder but Cracking the SAT are easier. PR 11 may be harder but are still good prep since they aren't as hard as Barrons. Barrons makes you want to give up on life.</p>
<p>Da PR iz gud 4 lernin, but itz prty hard 2 git da numbaz in da maff rite...</p>
<p>I skimmed through the book at the bookstore today. It didn't seem that bad, but it just didn't look that much like SAT math, making me pretty reluctant to buy it. Bah...</p>
<p>in my opinion, pr 11 prac tests are harder in critical reading. passages are sometimes obscure and questions are two-sided sometimes as well</p>
<p>HAHAHA how is no one laughing at Mainah!? That really made me lol man (or girl).</p>