Princeton Review and SAT II Literature...

<p>For those of you who used PR to study for the lit. exam, did you find the practice test to be harder, easier, or of equal difficulty compared to the actual exam?</p>

<p>Thanks!</p>

<p>~You'llsee...</p>

<p>felt the same</p>

<p>princeton review was about the same</p>

<p>barron's wasn't actually that far off either (though the scale was weird...)</p>

<p>Lit is so easy, don't study for it.</p>

<p>^Worst advice ever.</p>

<p>Not studying got me a 650. DON'T DO WHAT I DID AT ANY COST!</p>

<p>Angel (Techy233), wth? Lit is NOT easy.</p>

<p>I personally thought it was easy (800). BUT I am also a literature freak of nature haha. So if you're not crazy about books, STUDY!</p>

<p>Honestly, I'm addicted to books. I started reading stuff my parents read at the age of 12, and I did FAR from well on the exam.</p>

<p>...But then again... I suck at taking tests.</p>

<p>^ lol I'm also a rather decent test taker, so that helps (760 on CR)</p>

<p>haha. So yea... being a horrible test taker = horrible test scores whether or not you know the material.</p>