<p>I hear that the practice tests for the book is "easier" than the real stuff.</p>
<p>is that true for ACT/SAt, or both?</p>
<p>I hear that the practice tests for the book is "easier" than the real stuff.</p>
<p>is that true for ACT/SAt, or both?</p>
<p>no...the math is killing me...(maybe because I'm bad in math)...PR tests tend to be more difficult than the actual SAT...</p>
<p>My high on the Princeton Review practice tests (I took 4 of them and took all of them seriously) for Critical Reading was a 650. On my PSAT, and on 2 Collegeboard practice tests, I've received nothing below a 780.</p>
<p>thats what I thought, the problems were much easier then the SAT but much more tendious then the real SAT.</p>
<p>On math i got 700 and writing 560 and reading 590. I have never gotten so low on the writing during my CB tests, and the reading is avg/a little lower.</p>
<p>I thought that the Princeton Review books were very easy and sparse. They provided me with very little practice. The sparse practice that I did get was relatively easy compared to the SAT.</p>
<p>Yea, I got a 750 on a PR CR test, but only a 600 on the real test in December, and a 620 on my PSATs...</p>