Princeton/Stanford cross admits

<p>sf cooks the cross admit, by selecting about 1000 NE applicants wholikely to be accepted by HYP, SF admits them in almost half of them in RD. SF loses 90% of them to get 65% yield. Then declares victory saying I have peer data. Simple example, you narrow to 5 kids who will likely get in HYP then you admit them in RD. Out 5 , 4 get in RD. You lose all 4 to HYP. SF goes out saying we have high cross admit. What it does not say their yield is very low foe East Coast applicants. Since it has near 90% yield from CA pool( which is half the class at LSJU), it plays with low HYP cross admit yield for glory.</p>

<p>PENN Columbia Brown can create similar data, but they do not want publish high loss rate to HYP. You folks are real idiots, no world class instituiton can have 70% regional admits. Get it></p>

<p>Then explain the "Revealed Preference Ranking" that explicitly states that Stanford wins a large proportion of these cross-admits. In terms of winning cross-admits, Stanford is third only to Harvard and Yale of all the colleges in the U.S. and probably the world.</p>

<p>baba chooses to ignore the "Revealed Preference Ranking," and any other data that makes sense, sticking to his frivolous and idiotic claims. </p>

<p>Byerly, regarding Yale's ability to win cross-admits from other elite universities, namely HPSM, do you have any data that compares Stanford and Yale? I earlier mentioned an indirect link between the two universities in that Harvard's largest cross-admit pool is now with Stanford and Stanford is more successful at winning cross-admits from Harvard than Yale is.</p>

<p>I have no up to date information about the Stanford/Yale cross admit picture other than this:</p>

<p><a href="http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/2004/october6/decline-106.html%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/2004/october6/decline-106.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>The effect of the larger, but still exclusive, SCEA programs is - as no doubt intended - to reduce the size of the ovelap pools a bit, despite the claimed "openness" of SCEA vs binding ED.</p>

<p>Yes, I have already seen page. I was wondering if you had more recent data. As I have already said, I have not been able to find any information regarding Yale/Stanford cross-admits.</p>

<p>In the chart other 31%( most is Catech and UCB)</p>

<p>"In the chart other 31%( most is Catech and UCB)"</p>

<p>I know it's not a big accomplishment to prove baba wrong, but I'll do it anyway. On the site, it says that: "All other universities that were mentioned did not represent more than 2 percent, and no more than 1 percent indicated that they would attend a Pac-10 school." Since Berkeley is a Pac-10 school, there were probably fewer than 1 percent who chose Berkeley. In any case, no other school represented more than 2 percent. So that kinda blows your statement out of the water. Must be a bummer, but I'm sure you're used to it.</p>

<p>Yes, baba is proven completely wrong, yet again.</p>

<p>did i mention that SF gets 10000 applicant sfrom CA about 4000 UCB rejects among them, So among 1050 CA admits every year there are about 400 UCB rejects. Thnat is about 20% of the class.
LS Jr University
Admit Breakdown
CA; 1100( UCB rejects 400)
West( or, wa, az, NV..) 300
Midwest 300
South 300
NE 400
International 150</p>

<p>Enrollment
CA 770
West 230
Mid west 200
South 200
Interna 100
Northeast 100</p>

<p>With 70% regional enrollment it like UCB or University of Washimgton. It looses 75% of Northeast admits by design to create association.</p>

<p>In Northeast there are about 4000 applicants who can fit every where, only 10% apply to UC Palo alto( SFU)</p>

<p>There are based of analyzing there enrollemt and xmit data. If some has better data, spit it out. </p>

<p>West or pacific west, Berkeley is the best. Forget HYP.</p>

<p>Why is it that you're never able to prove your numbers? Can you actually quote a reliable source on that data, or are you just pulling that out of your @$$ again? Stanford has 40% CA enrollment, while Berkeley has 91%. You can't honestly claim that Stanford belongs in the UC system.</p>

<p>Based UG enrollement and yield rates etc you can come up these estimates. This is the only institution(UC Palo Alto) which does give geographical breakdown in apps and admits which others are always willing to share.</p>

<p>How did you come up with a complete regional breakdown of apps and enrollment? The only official figure is for CA (40%). And also, how did you assume that there are 400 Berkeley rejects admitted to Stanford? Nobody will believe you unless you cite a reliable source.</p>

<p>As I said above, baba just talks complete nonsense. There is no point challenging him because what he states is entirely incorrect.</p>