<p>I can’t speak to the quality of faculty at Grinnell (which is my HS junior son’s first choice), but I have some perspective as a university professor for 24 years, who is regularly evaluated, reviews other faculty members’ course evaluations in connection with annual merit reviews, periodically observes colleagues in the classroom, and has been involved in selection committee for outstanding faculty awards in which a variety of measures (not just student evaluations) are used.</p>
<p>Students are not the best judges of what constitutes effective teaching. As one respondent already noted, grades have something to do with how happy a student is with a teacher; harder graders tend to be more harshly judged by some (especially students who have sailed along with straight As and suddenly find themselves with some lower grades). Another common occurrence is for students to say a professor is disorganized when they don’t understand the material; at least, that’s what I conclude when I see such complaints about faculty whom I know to be hyper-organized.</p>
<p>On the other hand, students tend to like professors who are funny, etc.–which is of course delightful, but not necessarily an indicator of excellence in teaching. Many have the idea that classes should be entertainment, which is wrong-headed, in my opinion. They may also like a faculty member for capricious reasons: cool British accent, the professor’s clothing, etc. (hard to believe, I know).</p>
<p>Then there is the matter of expectations concerning the discipline in question. If a student takes a class in field that he or she thinks doesn’t have any rigor and then encounters rigor, there will tend to be dissatisfaction. I’ve actually had students who are unhappy on that account tell me that my class was supposed to be their “fun” class. I tell them that my field is an academic discipline that has to mastered like any other (which is why we have PhDs in the subject).</p>
<p>I would tend not to think these perceptions as that big of an issue at Grinnell or a comparable LAC, relative to large state universities, which draw a more uneven caliber of student. That would help explain why, in one class, a professor might get the highest possible rankings from one group of students with attendant positive written comments and dismal marks from another cohort, who say exactly the opposite. It’s the same class, with the same teacher, so the variable is the student.</p>
<p>That said, any institution of any size will have some standout teachers and some not so great ones and a lot in the middle. But LACs do place a great deal of emphasis on quality teaching and quality student-faculty interaction, which is a big part of the reason why I want my son to go to that kind of school and not the kind where I teach, which pays lip service to quality of teaching without very serious follow-through.</p>
<p>That’s my two cents. Hope it helps a little.</p>