<p>To anyone who has done so, how easy is publishing a research paper for a high school Asian female virgin under the age of eighteen years at this particular site? From what I've seen on their wretched site, their articles are of poor quality and repulsive grammar. And also, does anyone know any other fantastic journals in which it is realistically feasible for a student in high school to easily publish in?</p>
<p>…I’m really confused about how your virginity comes into this.</p>
<p>Maybe she means she won’t have to whore around to get published?</p>
<p>just kidding.</p>
<p>Please stay on topic.</p>
<p>You’re the one that brought it up - care to explain?</p>
<p>The inquiry you should be imposing upon me is why an individual’s virginity should not matter in terms of scientific publications. Afterall, when has sexual purity not been an advantage of astronomical significance? It is a promulgated fact that females with unpenetrated sexual apparatuses before the age of eighteen have been more successful later in life - they get into better colleges, have supreme salaries, and meet more robust men. On the other hand, the rotten and penetrated are destined failures. Simply take a gander at one of your fellow comrades who have been penetrated; prone to emotional detriments and fraught with failing grades, they are indeed the living manifestation of the common locution “phailing at life”. </p>
<p>Ostensibly, virginity before the age of eighteen is an intrinsic factor of success in numerous occasions. Consequently, it should be a determination in the success of scientific publication as well.</p>
<p>Have I answered your inquiry well, Karen? Or do you seek another verbose demonstration?</p>
<p>Wow, I hope this is fake. If not, your attitude may be a better indicator of (a lack of) future success (and admission to MIT) than sexual purity.</p>
<p>Nah, but I think I’d like some citations, rather than taking your ramblings at face value.</p>
<p>Rather than transforming this thread into one of humor and debate, let’s answer the inquiry imposed upon us by the original poster. :]</p>
<p>I’m really curious about this virginity / scientific accomplishment correlation. Isn’t your thread meant to promote scientific inquiry?</p>
<p>There have also been several other threads (many of which are on the front page of this forum) that ask roughly “how can I get published in high school”. Generally, you will have trouble writing an article that is quality enough to get published in a quality journal without some sort of professional mentorship, and your mentor will be better able to give you ideas for where to submit than a bunch of strangers on the internet, anyway. I would suggest that you either use your mentor as a resource, or that you find a mentor and then use him or her as a resource.</p>
<p>I would agree with the above advice, although I still find the manner the question was posed odd. I am also slightly perplexed as to why you refer to yourself in the third-person as the original poster.</p>
<p>let’s not penetrate on this topic any longer than it needs, shall we? :)</p>
<p>No, we must keep penetrating! Because no one really gave me a definite answer on how easy it is to publish in IJSER (I know that publishing in journals is usually very difficult for high school students, but it seems to apply quite less particularly for this journal). ;(</p>
<p>I’m not answering any more of your questions until you answer mine.</p>
<p>now guys, let’s not get cocky, and i can stop with the innuendos.</p>
<p>If it’s easy to publish in a particular journal, that’s probably a sign that you don’t want to publish there. (Because you could get diseases. I mean, because it’s not worth anything.)</p>
<p>The fact of publication isn’t the important part of doing research, especially in the eyes of undergraduate admissions committees. Even when you’re applying for graduate school, it’s not important to have published per se, just to have done interesting research. Having published in a journal that accepts all comers is meaningless.</p>
<p>I was under the impression that publications were nearly universal among applicants, and I would have been at an extreme disadvantage if I did not possess one.</p>
<p>Well, evidently you were incorrect.</p>
<p>Virginities are also not nearly as universal amongst high-achieving individuals as you may think.</p>
<p>I guess this thread has been quite the learning experience for you!</p>
<p>Actually I would say the majority of applicants aren’t published, and haven’t even done research. That is my impression anyway, Mollie or Chris may have something different to say.</p>
<p>The majority of applicants have not done research. And only a tiny minority of those who have done research will have published.</p>
<p>Even for graduate school applications, publication is not something the majority of applicants have.</p>