<p>What a great testing scenario for racial advantage, but seriously the guy who reported Caucasian should have identified with Columbia and marked it down...would have helped.</p>
<p>Honestly, I doubt that they look into it this much.</p>
<p>I hate to be the wiseass here, but it's Colombia, not Columbia.</p>
<p>and I doubt they actually call your house to verify the information. They'll probably take it as, "oh, i guess this brother feels he is more caucasion while the other brother takes pride in identifying himself as both races"</p>
<p>and why would you identify yourself as hispanic if you're only 1/8? I bet if such a kid existed, and he lived in America, he would definitely identify himself as white/anglo/caucasion or whatever in public life. Identifying yourself as hispanic even though you really don't in your regular life, just so you can have an advantage at college admissions, is really stupid.</p>
<p>Credit where credit is due, ihavenolife: Kyo7 was the original wiseass- it was just slightly tongue-in-cheek.
And yeah, if the question is "how do you identify yourself?" the discrepancy is allowed. If they verify at all (doubtful) it would be to better assess the racial situation for their purposes rather than to figure out which of the brothers is lying.</p>
<p>The real question is whether or not we are assuming that caucasian and caucasion are the same race.</p>