<p>i was just looking at the QS rankings, and that’s excellent for michigan. it’s ahead of many other great universities. but alexandre, why do you say they’re unreliable?</p>
<p>Because international rankings are usually unreliable. Universities cannot be ranked across boarders. Doing so would be tantamount to comparing apples to water mellons. </p>
<p>Even so, this ranking is filled with question marks. </p>
<p>1) Cal and Stanford should both be ranked higher. </p>
<p>2) France and Germany each have a dozen universities that belong among the top 100 in the World, and yet, France only has 2 in the top 100 and Germany just 5. </p>
<p>3) UCL, although excellent, is not on better than Oxford. </p>
<p>4) UCL and Imperial are both ranked among the top 10 but LSE is ranked #80?</p>
<p>Overall, this ranking favors British universities way too much and has a strong bias for universities in English-speaking countries.</p>
<p>But like I said, Michigan will benefit from its ranking (which I happen to think it fair), particularly in Europe, where the QS rankings are influential and well regarded.</p>
<p>I would say that 20 of the top 100 universities in the World are in France and Germany. Among the top 100, I would say the US has 40, the UK, France, Germany and Japan each have 10 or so, Canada and Australia each have 5 and the rest of the world has 10 or so.</p>